Решением госкомиссии в рамках федерального закона №102 от 26.06.2008 «Об обеспечении единства измерений», приборы для измерения «счетчики интернет-трафика электронные» отнесены к устройствам, требующим поверки («мероприятий, направленных на контроль соответствия объему и качеству измерений»). С января 2025 года эта норма будет воплощена в жизнь, говорится в постановлении правительства.
Wandering Thinker (Sharkey) нравится это.
"This week in KDE Apps" is out!
We migrated more apps to Qt6, made Dolphin more optimized for mobile, added many new features to Tokodon, and much more.
Read all about it at
blogs.kde.org/2024/10/20/this-…
This Week in KDE Apps
Welcome to a new issue of "This Week in KDE Apps"! Every week we cover as much as possible of what's happening in the world of KDE apps.This Week in KDE Apps
with 2 other dogs helping attack defenseless people unprovoked by these humans.
“…he was mean to my cat.”
(Death puts down the regular scythe and grabs the chainscythe)
“Let’s go.”
нравится это
Fitik, dandi8, dhhyfddehhfyy4673, Oofnik, KaRunChiy, Chozo, CapitalType и Joaoalberto9009 нравится это.
нравится это
Fitik и RandomStickman нравится это.
нравится это
KaRunChiy, Fitik и AlexanderESmith нравится это.
нравится это
Fitik нравится это.
нравится это
Fitik нравится это.
I use TikTok (around a hour a day) and use the Fediverse too(Mbin and Misskey fork), so I guess I am a target audience, so they do touch, pfft
Also there's Pixelfed userbase, I think they would like short form video platform, cause Instagram has it
нравится это
Fitik нравится это.
Yeah I wish there was a way to contribute to the hosting with torrent-like seeding. My phone can seed a torrent, but its not going to host an instance.
1 like = seed for 1 month seems like an interesting model
Naah I thought about this before and came to the conclusion that this isn't that bright of an idea. Here's why.
Why's video hosting so expensive in the first place? Because it needs a lot of computational power, storage and bandwidth. All three things that a mobile phone does not have. If you make your client's mobile phone do this stuff, then you're going to slow down their phone, make it heat up more, make it degrade faster (because it would be drawing power from the battery) and take up a huge chunk of their bandwidth.
Think of how video calls drain battery really fast. It's just shifting the costs of hosting from the hosting side to the consumer side while making the entire operation a lot more complicated and a lot more inefficient.
Take out the phone part and allow users to host videos in a decentralised way on their home computers and it's a genuinely good idea though. I have a server running with plenty of storage and reasonable upload speed. I could easily dedicate a terabyte or so, as long as I'm not the sole hoster.
It would be a hell of a lot cheaper than dedicated hosting. The only issue is legal problems when someone is unknowingly hosting abuse material, which is something that happens from time to time on all services like this, and an individual could be done for distribution without the protection big centralised services have. You'd just have to hope mods are on top of it.
Actually something like a debrid service but for peertube might work. You can get huge amounts of storage for cheap because a lot of it is shared, you might ask them to host a huge torrent file, but most torrent files serve multiple users, so the cost is distributed. Peertube could work a similar way if it were more mainstream.
Sure! Remember though, that you are funding this project using your own money. How much does your server cost? How much does the electricity to run your server cost? You would need Gbps speed internet. How much does that cost?
You would be funding this out of your own pocket. Thank you for doing that! Would there be a thousand more people willing to do this? What happens if you lose your job? What happens to the server?
As you can see, this is not a technological issue, but a funding one. If you can generate funding for this somehow, you have a very viable model! IF you can find the funding.
I am saying that funding this would be difficult. I see people just yapping about FOSS, but not funding it when the time comes.
What are you talking about? I don't think you understood the concept of decentralised torrent-like hosting.
I'm currently talking to a peertube hoster about server costs, which I may be able to justify to host my own videos plus a little extra to pitch in for others who can't justify the expense. Plenty of professional creators could easily justify it as an exit strategy or backup for youtube.
These conversations are happening, just not with you, presumably because you're just being negative about it and not actually doing something, so why would anyone bother to bring it up with you?
Ok, good luck on your project. We'll talk when any given peertube project (based on the donation based funding model alone) reaches break even.
I swear I've reviewed the finances about this a million times over. Funding models in their current form just don't work. Content creators getting free hosting from YouTube with huge audiences are struggling to keep themselves afloat. But whatever, good luck on your project I suppose. We really need YouTube's monopoly to end, so ¯\(ツ)/¯
нравится это
Fitik нравится это.
all the activation emails should be out by today
mastodon.social/@dansup/113346…
dansup (@dansup@mastodon.social)
Good Afternoon fediverse! We're at over 2k sign-ups on https://loops.video on the first day! Working to resolve issues and send out the remaining onboarding emails today. #loopsMastodon
Could I use my lemm.ee account and connect to it somehow?
Edit: signed up using my lemmy user (user@lemm.ee) I have no idea if this will work or not.
*Rocket Racoon AI voice over old Minecraft footage*
I dont like shorts
bad attention span
like no tik tok.
Honestly, this whole thing is a mess... first a countdown, then a website with basically no information and that's only the start.
More than 24 hours after signing up, I finally got an email with just about zero information:
Hi @dfyx,We're thrilled to welcome you to Loops.video!
We're in the process of onboarding all our new users, and we can't wait for you to experience the magic of short looping video.
Keep an eye out for another email from us later tonight or tomorrow (depending on when you signed up). It will have all the details you need to get started, including how to create your first Loop.
Welcome to the Loops community!
Regards,
The Loops Team
And from some random comment that dansup made on pixelfed I found out that this beta is only for Android. Apparently, iOS will come later and there is no info on a browser-based version. That info should have been on the website. Also, what about selfhosting? This is the fediverse after all...
microsoft wrote a debloat script for windows
github.com/microsoft/windows-d…
windows-dev-box-setup-scripts/scripts/RemoveDefaultApps.ps1 at master · microsoft/windows-dev-box-setup-scripts
Scripts to simplify setting up a Windows developer box - microsoft/windows-dev-box-setup-scriptsGitHub
поделились этим
gravitos поделился этим.
«Угадай страну по фотографии».
PhilTel ☎️ (@philtel@jawns.club)
Attached: 1 image Someone sent me pictures of this random house in Seattle and I am obsessed.jawns.club 🐘
Sensitive content
🔍 Описание
Фотография. На фото изображена тротуарная дорожка, ведущая к дому. По обе стороны дорожки растут деревья и кусты. Вдоль тротуара, слева, установлена телефонная будка. Вдали виднеется дом, а также еще несколько телефонных будок.
📝 Текст на картинке
PHONE
Не обнаружен.
"
Found 20 new servers and 11 servers died off since 7 hours ago.
22,775 servers checked. 14,287,910 Total Users with 1,059,862 Active Users today. Check out the stats!
New #fediverse servers found:
openedtech.global a #wordpress server from Germany
m.hit.moe a #misskey server from Private
fedi.knedlik.tv a #mastodon server from United Kingdom
social.pixelpost.uk a #gotosocial server from United Kingdom
weibo.shitoubaike.com a #misskey server from Private
pool-173-50-79-163.nrflva.fios.verizon.net a #snac server from United States
muz4now.com a #wordpress server from United States
sharkey.cubsex.pictures a #sharkey server from Private
test2.kmy.blue a #kmyblue server from Private
user-24-214-207-129.knology.net a #snac server from United States
fxckedtodeath.org a #mastodon server from Portugal
kitty.tube a #peertube server from United States
misskey.rilycat.f5.si a #misskey server from Private
misskey.ly2314.cc a #misskey server from United States
misskey.408.cafe a #misskey server from Brazil
live.finnvt.online a #owncast server from United States
hollo.ingyeo.net a #hollo server from South Korea
baka.ink a #mastodon server from Private
eepy.autumn.town a #sharkey server from Private
live.kyent.net a #owncast server from Private
Help others find a home, send them to fediverse.observer
☀️ VINNIUM /|\ The Druid Chief 👑 нравится это.
auto.onliner.by/2024/10/18/pro…
@велосипед
Спешиваться на переходах или нет? Итоги общественного обсуждения изменений в ПДД - Авто Onlíner
С 12 по 27 сентября 2024 года на Правовом форуме Беларуси проходило общественное обсуждение законопроекта об изменениях в Правила дорожного движения.Иван Кришкевич (Onlíner)
Шуро нравится это.
это просто настолько редкое и специфическое увлечение, что ради него никто не будет ковыряться с реструктуризацией улиц и прочего. это никому не нужно. к тому же, у нас 80% времени в году нельзя на всей этой фигне ездить всё равно, из-за погодных условий. так что не стоит овчинка выделки.
Как и с регистрацией и одокуменчиваем всего подряд.
С ныне отменённым спешиванием опять будет гемор. На очень многих переходах нарисовали зелёные велодорожки. Но к ним в придачу сейчас придумывают велосветофоры, которые никто, разумеется, ставить не будет. В итоге все как ездили, так и будут ездить, а менты пытаться за это ловить, что не так-то и просто.
Меня больше беспокоит этот долбаный энтузазизм с одокуменчиванием, который дебильная толпа так активно поддерживает. Мне это до боли напоминает митинги и партсобрание советских времён. Там тоже толпа в едином порыве кричала "Дадим пятилетку за три дня!". А потом, выйдя и покурив, каждый в отдельности удивлённо думал "А нахера мне это было надо, глотку рвать за этот геморрой на свою жопу?"
Шуро нравится это.
А там мозги иначе не работают, особенно на постсоветском пространстве. Любая проблема решается учётом и документами, если она этим не решается, то документов нужно больше - до тех пор, пока она не решится. Например, тем, что на велосипедах просто перестанут ездить, так как согласовывать план каждой поездки в национальном комитете по безопасности станет слишком затратно, если речь не о олимпийской велогонке 😀
У нас вот опять начали заигрывать с номерами и обномерили прокатные самокаты и пытаются навесить на курьеров (а у них хоть и электро, но формально велосипеды). К счастью, эффекта от номеров настолько ноль, что пока идея сама себя дискредитирует и хочется верить, что скоро помрёт.
Wandering Thinker нравится это.
Это уже вопросы инфраструктуры и езды по тротуарам в принципе. Но вон в том же Минске половина переходов уже разделены на пешеходную и вело-часть. И, что характерно, хотя они там по большей части широкие, на велосипедную разметку чаще прутся пешеходы 😀
Вообще, требование спешивания не с заботой о пешеходах связано, а с нежеланием делать нормальные переходы, на которые не будут вываливаться автомобили с ограниченной видимостью. Предполагается, что можно как-нибудь и так, а пешеход в случае чего отскочит.
До недавнего времени Москва была исключением - все переходы были разнесены по потокам и на зебру машины не выкатывались вообще. Сейчас, к сожалению, решили, что водятелы не могут постоять лишние 10 секунд, поэтому разрешили им проезжать на пешеходный зелёный, как и в остальной России.
на велосипедную разметку чаще прутся пешеходы
Именно так. 😀 Хотя пешеходная часть вдвое шире, как правило, всё равно треть попрётся на зелёненькое, где нарисован большой велосипед.
@Iron Bug , я как велосипедист могу выкатить точно такую же претензию в обратную сторону. Эти долбоёбы забегают на велодорожку между велосипедистом и проезжей частью на самый край, на бордюр, и потом как сумасшедшие начинают там беспорядочно тусить по всей ширине как мухи на говне. Хотя всё крупно нарисовано прямо перед носом для тупых, слепых, убогих и прочих альтернативно развитых. 😀 Эту же претензию можно распостранить и на велодорожки.
Насчёт "сбили со спины". Если переход пустой, то никаких проблем разъехаться нет в принципе. Если там толпа, то сбить кого-то можно только целенаправленно, прикинувшись террористом. Но проще, быстрее и безболезненнее всё-таки объехать эту толпу за пределами зебры. 😀
GitHub - sv1sjp/lemmy-rss-pybot: Lemmy RSS PyBot is a powerful Python bot that reads RSS feeds and posts new articles to your favorite Lemmy communities.
Hello everyone! 🎉
I’ve created an RSS Feed Bot that automates sharing news in Lemmy and Fediverse channels, helping to keep Fediverse users better informed. The bot is written in Python3 and can easily run via Docker Compose.
Hope you find it useful! 🚀
#Lemmy #Fediverse #RSS #Python #Docker #Automation #OpenSource
GitHub - sv1sjp/lemmy-rss-pybot: Lemmy RSS PyBot is a powerful Python bot that reads RSS feeds and posts new articles to your favorite Lemmy communities.
Lemmy RSS PyBot is a powerful Python bot that reads RSS feeds and posts new articles to your favorite Lemmy communities. - sv1sjp/lemmy-rss-pybotGitHub
нравится это
Joaoalberto9009 и stack нравится это.
Good stuff. You can also do the same by talking with bot@rss.ponder.cat, if you don't want to install something separate:
You need a human to see what is actually interesting and what will be interesting to most people.
I've seen communities where hundreds of posts are scrolling by, nobody cares. Because it's not interesting.
And do some comments / recap. I find annoying people just posting link without saying anything. IMHO lemmy is about people opinion not just sharing link.
If you want news links then rss reader, Google news, Flipboard or whatever are what should be used.
Not to say OP didn't do a good work. But Lemmy is better when you are not ending just clicking link to read articles.
So a suggestion would be at minimal to add an AI recap as post comment.
rss reader, Google news, Flipboard
Those do not have votes. That's the main feature of a link aggregator: to get crowdsourced voting on content.
I post a lot, a lot of those articles don't need any comments, usually the article preview is enough for the readers to get a gist of what is going to be discussed in the article.
В каком смысле «извращать»? Это единственно правильный режим, если включить логику.
В Мастодоне ровно так же.
Lemmy's gaining popularity, so I thought new people should see this.
cross-posted from: feddit.nl/post/16246531
I feel like we need to talk about Lemmy's massive tankie censorship problem. A lot of popular lemmy communities are hosted on lemmy.ml. It's been well known for a while that the admins/mods of that instance have, let's say, rather extremist and onesided political views. In short, they're what's colloquially referred to as tankies. This wouldn't be much of an issue if they didn't regularly abuse their admin/mod status to censor and silence people who dissent with their political beliefs and for example, post things critical of China, Russia, the USSR, socialism, ...As an example, there was a thread today about the anniversary of the Tiananmen Massacre. When I was reading it, there were mostly posts critical of China in the thread and some whataboutist/denialist replies critical of the USA and the west. In terms of votes, the posts critical of China were definitely getting the most support.
I posted a comment in this thread linking to "https://archive.ph/2020.07.12-074312/https://imgur.com/a/AIIbbPs" (WARNING: graphical content), which describes aspects of the atrocities that aren't widely known even in the West, and supporting evidence. My comment was promptly removed for violating the "Be nice and civil" rule. When I looked back at the thread, I noticed that all posts critical of China had been removed while the whataboutist and denialist comments were left in place.
This is what the modlog of the instance looks like:
Definitely a trend there wouldn't you say?
When I called them out on their one sided censorship, with a screenshot of the modlog above, I promptly received a community ban on all communities on lemmy.ml that I had ever participated in.
Proof:
So many of you will now probably think something like: "So what, it's the fediverse, you can use another instance."
The problem with this reasoning is that many of the popular communities are actually on lemmy.ml, and they're not so easy to replace. I mean, in terms of content and engagement lemmy is already a pretty small place as it is. So it's rather pointless sitting for example in /c/linux@some.random.other.instance.world where there's nobody to discuss anything with.
I'm not sure if there's a solution here, but I'd like to urge people to avoid lemmy.ml hosted communities in favor of communities on more reasonable instances.
Lemmy.ml tankie censorship problem
I feel like we need to talk about Lemmy's massive tankie censorship problem. A lot of popular lemmy communities are hosted on lemmy.ml. It's been well known for a while that the admins/mods of that instance have, let's say, rather extremist and onesided political views. In short, they're what's colloquially referred to as tankies. This wouldn't be much of an issue if they didn't regularly abuse their admin/mod status to censor and silence people who dissent with their political beliefs and for example, post things critical of China, Russia, the USSR, socialism, ...As an example, there was a thread today about the anniversary of the Tiananmen Massacre. When I was reading it, there were mostly posts critical of China in the thread and some whataboutist/denialist replies critical of the USA and the west. In terms of votes, the posts critical of China were definitely getting the most support.
I posted a comment in this thread linking to "https://archive.ph/2020.07.12-074312/https://imgur.com/a/AIIbbPs" (WARNING: graphical content), which describes aspects of the atrocities that aren't widely known even in the West, and supporting evidence. My comment was promptly removed for violating the "Be nice and civil" rule. When I looked back at the thread, I noticed that all posts critical of China had been removed while the whataboutist and denialist comments were left in place.
This is what the modlog of the instance looks like:
Definitely a trend there wouldn't you say?
When I called them out on their one sided censorship, with a screenshot of the modlog above, I promptly received a community ban on all communities on lemmy.ml that I had ever participated in.
Proof:
So many of you will now probably think something like: "So what, it's the fediverse, you can use another instance."
The problem with this reasoning is that many of the popular communities are actually on lemmy.ml, and they're not so easy to replace. I mean, in terms of content and engagement lemmy is already a pretty small place as it is. So it's rather pointless sitting for example in /c/linux@some.random.other.instance.world where there's nobody to discuss anything with.
I'm not sure if there's a solution here, but I'd like to urge people to avoid lemmy.ml hosted communities in favor of communities on more reasonable instances.
нравится это
etai, SharkAttak, Fitik, TheFederatedPipe, themadcodger, 𝔻𝕚𝕖𝕘𝕠 🦝🧑🏻💻🍕 и stack нравится это.
нравится это
xep и can_you_change_your_username нравится это.
нравится это
can_you_change_your_username и Fitik нравится это.
To be fair, those deaths can be blamed on the brutality of the likes of Stalin and Mao. Communism didn’t kill those people— but its authoritarian nature certainly provided fertile ground to be abused by monsters.
Like most things political, it’s highly nuanced and complex. I don’t particularly like to defend communism, but an ideology alone can’t do anything. It requires bad actors who use that ideology for their own ends.
нравится это
Fitik нравится это.
A few things. Communism isn't Marxist leninism. Communism isn't authoritarian. And it's not just Stalin and Mao. It's literally everywhere Marxist leninism has ever been attempted. Communism is a classless stateless society. Therefore a Marxist leninist government will never become communist. Because they are defined by their class separation of those with political power and those without, and the strong overbearing presence of the state.
There's nothing objectionable to Communism whatsoever. And no one should have any qualms about defending it ever. What we should question is why one group of authoritarians the Marxist leninist desire to be so closely tied to it. And another group of authoritarians the capitalists demand everyone be afraid of it.
you mean the us-led neoliberal ideology?
if so, agreed
All instances, except for the lightly moderated ones, have censorship issues from time to time. You can say one thing on one thread, and that same thing can get you banned in another thread on the same instance. This is an issue with the great degree of political polarization on Lemmy.
My point is that Lemmy is multipolar. It’s divided between the right-leaning instances like Lemmy.world and sh.itjust.works, the left-leaning instances like Lemmy.ml, slrpnk.net, blahaj.zone, and dbzer0, and the leftist instances like Hexbear.net and Lemmygrad.ml. Mods and admins on each instance are guilty of maintaining the “instance line.”
When I called them out on their one sided censorship, with a screenshot of the modlog above, I promptly received a community ban on all communities on lemmy.ml that I had ever participated in.
While I won't repeat what got me banned, this is what got me banned from Political Memes on Lemmy.world, this isn't just a Lemmy.ml thing. This is also when one of the moderators claimed they weren't censoring anyone and were incredibly fair on a comment chain calling out their censorship, and refused to elaborate. They would not even tell me how I could edit my comments to comply with their rules.
What does this all mean?
Honestly, I think close to everyone knows that Marxists dominate Lemmy.ml, Lemmygrad.ml, Hexbear.net, etc. I think close to everyone knows Liberals dominate Lemmy.world. I think everyone knows that anarchists dominate dbzer0, slrpnk.net, Hexbear.net, etc.
If your call to action is to defederate Lemmy.ml, then that's just contributing to this polarization effect, as people would jump ship from .world and .ml to the other if it fits their views better. If your call to action is that people should move communities from Lemmy.ml to other instances, this has already happened a bit, this thread gets reposted very frequently. All it really seems to me is that you're spreading drama.
What do I recommend?
Rather than trying to consolidate communities across instances, replicate communities as needed. Communities on Lemmy are more like hashtags for an instance, and instances are more like subreddits of old. Instances have their own cultures and values, so a Gaming thread on Hexbear, for example, is going to be different from a Lemmy.world Gaming thread, and that's a good thing. All sorting can still let you see other instances, there's no need to risk moderator dominance over communities by trying to consolidate on a single instance. Heck, this community is an example of that very process.
Very well put, and I completely agree!
As I said in another reply, I think everyone should have their space. I, however, don’t wish to share a space with those in lemmy.ml and think many others would agree. I am but spreading the word to those who do. I’m not advocating to defederate anything, just advising new users to watch where they are active; I wouldn’t want anyone going down an extremist pipeline on either side of the political spectrum.
Thank you for your comment, stranger.
You can aleady block instances if you personally wish, is my point. Everyone knows about Lemmy.ml having Marxists. My point is that rather than trying to move communities and keep them consolidated, embrace the differences between instances and be okay with Lemmy.world and Lemmy.ml both having Linux communities, as an example.
I don't share your fear of Marxism and Marxists, which is why I tend to avoid Lemmy.world communities.
нравится это
originalucifer нравится это.
нравится это
originalucifer нравится это.
You can block the instance, which blocks those communities, but that doesn't block those users on them to be fair. That has to be done individually.
Personally I am comfortable ignoring individuals (and not painting everyone on an instance with the same brush) and would prefer metas/groups/whatever you'd like to refer to them as for my subscriptions, so I'm definitely not the target user of this post.
But just being clear, a user blocking an instance doesn't block the users from that instance, so if that's their goal, no, that's not enough.
Not advocating for defederation, I'm just pointing out that blocking an instance isn't going to achieve their goal.
Obviously defederation is too large scale. Ideally, there would be an option for people to block users from the instance when blocking an instance, or something like that.
This would avoid the exact scenario you mention because it would come down to the user level, so that troll would have to put in quite a bit more effort to get around that. Unfortunately, that's not currently an option, along with some other features I'd love to see on Lemmy.
Again, I'm just pointing out that blocking an instance does not achieve their goal.
Obviously defederation is too large scale. Ideally, there would be an option for people to block users from the instance when blocking an instance, or something like that.
I agree with this most out of what you said. This gives users the most power to curate what they see, and lessens the likelyhood of troll accounts.
but that doesn’t block those users on them to be fair. That has to be done individually.
It blocks notifications of replies.
Sometimes I'll notice a .ml responded to me, and if they seem decent I'll reply back. But I'll never get a notification and that's almost always as far as it goes.
Which is fine. Lots of people can make one civil comment to rope someone in a conversation.
I wouldn’t want anyone going down an extremist pipeline on either side of the political spectrum.
This isn't a binary thing, there's plenty of centrist extremists and echo chambers for them
There were two “Reigns of Terror,” if we would but remember it and consider it; the one wrought murder in hot passion, the other in heartless cold blood; the one lasted mere months, the other had lasted a thousand years; the one inflicted death upon ten thousand persons, the other upon a hundred millions; but our shudders are all for the “horrors” of the minor Terror, the momentary Terror, so to speak; whereas, what is the horror of swift death by the axe, compared with lifelong death from hunger, cold, insult, cruelty, and heart-break? What is swift death by lightning compared with death by slow fire at the stake? A city cemetery could contain the coffins filled by that brief Terror which we have all been so diligently taught to shiver at and mourn over; but all France could hardly contain the coffins filled by that older and real Terror — that unspeakably bitter and awful Terror which none of us has been taught to see in its vastness or pity as it deserves.
Taken from redsails.org/the-two-terrors/
The Two Terrors
There were two “Reigns of Terror,” if we would but remember it and consider it; the one wrought murder in hot passion, the other in heartless cold blood; the one lasted mere months, the other had lasted a thousand years; the one inflicted death upon …redsails.org
just advising new users to watch where they are active; I
Your profile has 10 posts/comments and has been around for a week....
Are you the original OP who just keeps making new accounts to spam this?
Or do you think 10 posts/comments over a week means you understand Lemmy and should reach out to teach "new users"?
Nah, I replied to OP and they deleted the comment.
Maybe that looks weird on some federated instances or apps tho.
If it looks like I'm replying to someone else, that would explain the down votes.
OPs post gets reposted pretty frequently, always by new accounts which tend to disappear a day or two later after some lazy posts.
I really do think it's the same person who's bans are in the screenshots.
It's too random that a bunch of brand new accounts all find the post and quote it with perfectly formatting including all the pictures just to repost it the same place they found it.
Especially since the new account always claims they're "helping new users" like they've been here forever.
нравится это
can_you_change_your_username нравится это.
They… don’t though? Unless you’re pretending saying “voting for [not the democratic candidate] is a vote for Trump” is now apparently right wing and not just a basic understanding of how first past the post works.
Like, your definition is both wrong in terms of what right wing means, and not even descriptive of either. They’re just not tankie shitholes so I guess that makes them look bad to you?
нравится это
can_you_change_your_username нравится это.
So accusing left wingers of being right wing is okay as far as you're concerned if it's about an election
Pointing out that from a left wing perspective, Biden and the Democrats are doing bad things and their supporters are right wing: wrong, not descriptive, belongs in a tankie shit hole.
K
That’s… not an accurate characterization.
I would have voted for Sanders in a heartbeat. And a lot of other (Americans) on my instance would too. The disdain is more targeted and nuanced than that. A whole lot of us on sh.it just.works have a reasonably solid understanding of the difference between communism and authoritarian communism, and are also often geopolitical nerds to one degree or another. This often leads to us doing our best to combat what we see as bullshit disinformation and misrepresentation when and where we see it.
The vitriol we have towards tankies is specifically a result of:
- our dislike of the glorification of historical authoritarian leaders (Stalin; Mao)
- the intentional blurring of the line between communism (which, bluntly, many of us don’t actually have a problem with) and authoritarian communism
- the jingoistic support of modern authoritarian states that either call themselves “communist” despite not really being anything of the sort (China), or who have a historical lineage that runs through an (again, authoritarian) communist state (Russia)
When looked at that way, it’s a lot closer to modern Iron Front ideology (anti-monarchy; anti-fascist; anti-authoritarian communist).
That's... what? What?! WHAT!?
To anyone else reading, note the @lemmy.ml after their name. There are only so many times people of intelligence can hear the most batshit insane things on Lemmy without either willfully losing IQ points or else blocking the lemmy.ml instance.
Unfortunately, that does next to nothing, bc you'll still see every single batshit insane comment like the above. Every. Single. One. And while it might be a bug, you can sometimes get replies from them too (while other times blissfully not).
Maybe I'll make an account on Lemmy.cafe, which is the only instance I've ever heard of that has actually defederated from lemmy.ml. Though I'm holding out more hope for Sublinks, Piefed, and Mbin too to help address such issues.
Stay safe folks - election season is coming and there are some who want to fuck you up if at all possible (not necessarily the above comment, just in general), don't let it happen!
So... blocking an instance as a user just hides the instances communities, if I'm remembering the implementation details right. It doesn't block interaction with the instances users. Stupidly misleading.
You'll still need to block the users one by one.
Sadly, I had quite the list going, but upon blocking the instance, decided to clean up all the individual ones from that instance. Oops. Surely a "block" would imply some sort of... I dunno, "blocking" action, one might expect?
Also, at least on 0.19.3, I would not receive notifications from people on those instances. But now on 0.19.5, I do. So... there's that fun little tidbit of knowledge: what little blocking there used to be, has become less so over time.
Oh well, at least this way I get to read the most batshit insane replies to things and laugh at them. Once someone is aware, it's not really shocking, compared to a new user who would have no clue - e.g. they could be conversing with an actual PhD scientist on mander.xyz one moment and then somehow jump all the way to "no awkshually you should drink bleach, and follow up by drinking sunshine, bc (this one time at band camp?) I heard that kills the Rona". Which sounds enormously exaggerated I know, but just remember: there are people out there eating raw meat and drinking unpasteurized milk without a care in the world, even in the face of the avian flu situation that seems to have made its way into just about every animal on earth including extremely remote polar bears and such.
Disinformation, unlike misinformation that is more often simply a mistake, is often designed to be outright deadly, to the unprepared (though less for the sake of the actual deaths, and more for how they would then catapult the issue into the media to receive feed-forward attention).
Lemmy.world is extremely liberal, I wouldn't classify it as left-leaning. Both .world and sh.itjust.works are generally liberal, maintaining MeanwhileOnGrad leads to more right-wing people. I did not say far-right, or even right-wing, but right-leaning.
Marxists are absolutely left wing, not sure what your point is here. Marx and Engels were both called "authoritarian" by their contemporaries so much that Engels wrote On Authority. I don't think it makes sense to separate Marxism from Leftism, and redefine leftism as Anarchism.
нравится это
can_you_change_your_username нравится это.
muh libs aren’t left leaning
And you expect me to take anything you say after that seriously
нравится это
can_you_change_your_username нравится это.
When I say Leftist, I am using the typical definition, anti-Capitalist. Socialism, Communism, Syndicalism, Anarchism, and all their myriad forms.
When I say right, I am using the typical definition, supportive of Capitalism. Social Democrats, Liberals, American Libertarians, fascists, and all their myriad forms.
Considering Lemmy is an international site, it doesn't make sense to use the Overton Window. If we went by, say, the American Overton Window, but another user lived in, say, Spain, there's a significant difference there. That's why I am using the standard definitions, and not going off of any one country's Overton Window.
When I say right, I am using the typical definition, supportive of Capitalism. Social Democrats, Liberals, American Libertarians, fascists, and all their myriad forms.
For two of the words this is not a typical definition. Social democrats do not code as "right" anywhere in the world. And liberals are only "right" when viewed through a partisan US-progressive lens, or else perhaps in southern Europe (where the word is mostly an economic term). Elsewhere they would be closer to left or center. This whole discussion illustrates the limited usefulness of the left-right axis at describing ideas.
нравится это
can_you_change_your_username нравится это.
Social democrats do not code as "right" anywhere in the world.
Are you trying to say that wherever Social Democrats are found, they are the most left available? That may track, but again, Social Democrats want to "harness Capitalism," it isn't pro-Socialism nor anti-Capitalism, hence my categorization.
And liberals are only "right" when viewed through a partisan US-progressive lens, or else perhaps in southern Europe (where the word is mostly an economic term)
Liberalism is the ideological framework for Capitalism, this is, again, supportive of Capitalism and against Socialism.
My biggest issue is with these two statements:
But the fact is that capitalism won the economic battle, for better and (I agree) for worse.Attempts to replace it completely, in an interconnected world, invariably end in disaster or (China) in a reversion to capitalism.
For the former, I disagree because AES states still exist, and Marx's analysis has retained it's usefulness at full capacity.
For the latter, most AES states were and are dramatic improvements on previous conditions, such as the fascist slaver Batista regime in Cuba compared to now, where life expectancy is 50% higher than under Batista and disparity is far lower.
As for the PRC, it isn't correct to say it "reverted to Capitalism." It's more correct to say that Mao failed to jump to Communism, and Deng reverted back to a more Marxist form of Socialism, compatible with China's existing level of development. The Private Sector is a minority of the economy in the PRC, the majority is in the public sector. Here's an excerpt from Engels in The Principles of Communism:
Will it be possible for private property to be abolished at one stroke?No, no more than existing forces of production can at one stroke be multiplied to the extent necessary for the creation of a communal society. In all probability, the proletarian revolution will transform existing society gradually and will be able to abolish private property only when the means of production are available in sufficient quantity.
Mao tried to skip the necessary developmental stage. Marx wasn't a Utopian, he didn't believe Socialism was good because it was more moral, but because Capitalism creates the conditions for Socialism, ie public ownership and central planning, through formation of monopolist syndicates. Marx says as much himself in Manifesto of the Communist Party:
The essential conditions for the existence and for the sway of the bourgeois class is the formation and augmentation of capital; the condition for capital is wage-labour. Wage-labour rests exclusively on competition between the labourers. The advance of industry, whose involuntary promoter is the bourgeoisie, replaces the isolation of the labourers, due to competition, by the revolutionary combination, due to association. The development of Modern Industry, therefore, cuts from under its feet the very foundation on which the bourgeoisie produces and appropriates products. What the bourgeoisie therefore produces, above all, are its own grave-diggers. Its fall and the victory of the proletariat are equally inevitable.
The PRC increases ownership of and eventually folds into the Public Sector companies and industries that form these monopolist syndicates.
For further reading re: China, Socialism Developed China, Not Capitalism is a good modern essay. For elaboration on Marx and the transition to Socialism, I recommend Why Public Property?
The reason I didn't want to have this conversation on Lemmy.world is that I have had similar comments to this one removed for "misinformation."
Do you not think your remarks have a bit of a religious flavor to them? Quoting a couple of eccentric academics from 150 years ago as if transmitting their divine revelation. Defending your interpretation of their holy words as if you were a lawyer or a priest. Why not just look to first principles instead, to the values you considerate important, rather than citing a gospel like this?
I must admit that I am puzzled by people's determination to defend the record of communism. It's not worth defending. There are much better ideas for how to replace capitalism, though - spoiler - none of them involve a bloody revolution. This doesn't mean that Marx had nothing interesting to say. Of course he did. His description of society was revolutionary. But the prescription was disastrous and I feel we would do well to just move on from it at last.
Do you not think your remarks have a bit of a religious flavor to them? Quoting a couple of eccentric academics from 150 years ago as if transmitting their divine revelation. Defending your interpretation of their holy words as if you were a lawyer or a priest. Why not just look to first principles instead, to the values you considerate important, rather than citing a gospel like this?
I quoted both Marx and Engels, while linking modern analysis and theory at the end. Marxism has a long history with numerous writers, when you say the PRC has "reverted to Capitalism" it's important to point out that they have more accurately reverted to Socialism. Marxism isn't a religion, it's a method of analysis.
I don't know what you mean by "look to principles instead." I have values and principles, I desire humanity to move beyond Capitalism and onto Socialism because Capitalism reaches a dead-end when it gets to the stage it is at today: dying Imperialism and Monopolist Syndicates devoid of competition. Socialism is how we move beyond.
There are much better ideas for how to replace capitalism, though - spoiler - none of them involve a bloody revolution
I have yet to see anything succeed in replacing Capitalism without a revolution, so I'm curious what you are referring to.
This doesn't mean that Marx had nothing interesting to say. Of course he did. His description of society was revolutionary. But the prescription was disastrous and I feel we would do well to just move on from it at last
Again, post-revolution, Marxism has dramatically improved conditions compared to previous squalor. It isn't correct to say AES states have been disastrous, especially when comparing to the horrendous pre-Socialist conditions. AES isn't a utopian paradise either, but to call them "disastrous" is a bit outside of reality. I recommend reading Blackshirts and Reds by Dr. Michael Parenti.
This feels like arguing with a Jehovah's witness. To your credit, you're not getting annoyed or abusive in the face of my contradiction. But then that's also a hallmark of religious people: absolute certitude, which provides a certain peace of mind.
I'll admit that I had to look up "AES", which appears to refer to countries that pass the magical litmus test of Marx-Engels Compatibility.
I will simply sum up my own analysis. The precise terminology of the PRC's political system is unimportant. What is important is that wherever the recipes of Marx have been tried, the result has been violence, brutality, oppression, famine, economic ruin. I say that as a student of history. Literally: it was my degree. But the facts are in the public domain for all to see. And so I agree with Orwell, who saw it before so many others: there comes a point where you have to accept that the thing is irredeemable, and instead try something else.
That's really all I have to say on the subject. Of course I respect your right to your own viewpoint.
Then as a student of history, are you saying the Tsars, Kuomintang, Batista regime, and so forth were better for their citizenry than the Communists? It's very well-recorded just how bad the previous regimes were and how dramatically material conditions improved post-revolution.
This feels like arguing with a Jehovah's witness. To your credit, you're not getting annoyed or abusive in the face of my contradiction. But then that's also a hallmark of religious people: absolute certitude, which provides a certain peace of mind.
The fact that I have carefully cited multiple different sources from multiple periods and patiently responded to your bold-faced attacks makes me a "Jehovah's Witness?" What about those supposed "much better alternatives to Capitalism?" Where are those? I have responded to every point you've made, and your response has been to belittle me and take the high-ground without responding in kind. That's rude.
Arguing is tiring, and here the payoff will be small since the conversation has moved on, few others are reading. I've made my point.
Look on the positive side. Humans being what they are, it's not usually reason that wins debates, but rather the agreeableness of the participants. So you've probably won this one by default.
as they are more prone to censorship
More prone than who? ml?
Pretty sure i have seen you say this explicitly at some point, but i'll just take these easy to find snippets from 6 days ago, where you talk about what you're up to outside of hexbear, although tbf you were talking about slrpnk users here:
I've spoken with a few users, carefully pointing out how by being anti-Marxist but not also being anti-liberal, and further having no links to theory of any sort beyond aesthetic choices, opens them up to opportunism. They seemed to vaguely accept it, hope it can get through to them.I am trying to convince individual users when the opportunity arises.
You're doing great! Also with your "reasonable nice guy" facade!
More prone than who? ml?
Yep, if you're a Marxist, you risk being censored on .world
You're doing great! Also with your "reasonable nice guy" facade!
Do you disagree with what I said there? I fully believe solarpunk is especially at risk of opportunism, I fully back that, and even some of their users agree that they should do more to combat that, such as linking solarpunk theory and trying to be more unified in message.
Secondly, what do you mean by "reasonable nice guy facade?" Do you think I have been unreasonable or secretly evil? What's your point?
What happens if you turn this around?
The precise terminology of the US's political system is unimportant. What is important is that wherever the recipes of [Liberalism] have been tried, the result has been violence, brutality, oppression, famine, economic ruin.
This is all true of course. So what then? Do you also reject Liberalism?
There are those - like Jules Verne, HG Wells, and yes Orwell - who can see far into the future not because they are fucking magicians or whatever, but bc they allowed themselves to see clearly. Which in turn I think comes from mental discipline to ruthlessly weed out the false thoughts that would choke the life out of the true ones.
Anyway I'm full of trite quotes in this reply I guess but even so, those who don't learn from their history are doomed to repeat it, and lately I (who lives in America) am very worried about that thought... and yet there too it is history that gives me comfort. No nation (afaict) has ever survived devolving into a 2-party state, but even Rome fell too once upon a time... long may it live.
Social democrats do not code as “right” anywhere in the world.
Except in Portugal, where the conservative party calls themselves Social Democrats.
Hang on now. Fascists are historically the "third position" (which is why both the left and the right got together in about 1939 to stomp their collective shit in.) They're neither "right" nor "left."
Fascism is described as both "Capitalism in decay" and as "Imperialism turned inward." It served and serves the bourgeoisie and petite bourgeoisie against the Proletariat and Lumpenproletariat, and historically arises when the Petite Bourgeoisie is facing proletarianization. That's why the most violently MAGA are small business owners and the like, and why they think immigrants are the ones proletarianizing them.
I highly recommend reading the first chapter of Blackshirts and Reds by Dr. Michael Parenti, which covers the material conditions surrounding fascism and who it served.
When the hell did I do that? Lmao dude are you ok? Talk about unfounded in reality lmao:
It's going to be useless to explain it to you, you've already made up your mind, and since I'm no longer shitting and have things to do today I'm going to have to decline your request to waste my time explaining natsocs.
Where did I call you a nazi? Is it "it's useless to explain it to you, you've already made up your mind?" So Nazi = Guy who already made up his mind? Ooook.
Or was it "I'm done shitting," and nazis are people I talk to while shitting? Seems weird to define that way but ok I guess.
Or maybe "decline your request to waste my time explaining natsocs?" So, then, anyone I won't waste my time talking to, they must be nazis? I mean yeah they usually do fall into that category too but it isn't exclusive to them.
Ah, I misread, I thought you said "explaining to Natsocs like you" and not "explaining Natsocs to you." My bad, I apologize.
That being said, you were the one coming in to dispute my claim that fascism is right-wing, and the second I pushed back you said it would be a waste of time to explain, I just think that's a bit silly. Did you expect me to fully agree with you instantaneously?
Ah ok no harm no foul then!
And I provided a link you didn't read, you provided a link I didn't read. Fair's fair. Plus it isn't actually about convincing you, it's about leaving a record to let other people read and not just take your words at face value. You're too far gone.
For clarity, I did read the link you sent. I've read it before.
Plus it isn't actually about convincing you, it's about leaving a record to let other people read and not just take your words at face value. You're too far gone
That's fine, I am doing the same for you. I doubt you'll be convinced, but it's important to correct blatant misconceptions about Marxism IMO.
Since you linked to another Wikipedia article, you should know that Wikipedia defines fascism as far-right:
Fascism is a far-right, authoritarian, ultranationalist political ideology and movement, characterized by a dictatorial leader, centralized autocracy, militarism, forcible suppression of opposition, belief in a natural social hierarchy, subordination of individual interests for the perceived good of the nation or race, and strong regimentation of society and the economy.
And it also defines it as third position, as per the article I linked earlier. Again, some define fascism as "mommy said I can't go to the party" so oooooohhhhh.
Fact of the matter is fascists, if you've ever talked to a real one, are neither capitalist nor communist (again, hence that whole "World War Two" fiasco they teamed up for.) Thus "third position."
"From the article I linked:"
The term "Third Position" was coined in Europe and the main precursors of Third Position politics were Italian fascism, Legionarism, Falangism, Prussian socialism, National Bolshevism (a synthesis of far-right ultranationalism and far-left Bolshevism) and Strasserism (a radical, mass-action, worker-based form of Nazism, advocated by the "left-wing" of the Nazi Party by brothers Otto and Gregor Strasser, until it was crushed in the Night of the Long Knives in 1934). Neo-fascist, neo-Nazi author Francis Parker Yockey had proposed an alliance between communists and fascists called the red-brown alliance (Red being the color of communism and Brown being the color of Nazism). Yockey lent support to Third World liberation movements as well.In the United States, Political Research Associates argues that Third Position politics has been promoted by some white nationalist and neo-Nazi groups such as the National Alliance, American Front, Traditionalist Worker Party, Patriot Front, and White Aryan Resistance, as well as some black nationalist groups, such as the Nation of Islam, since the late 20th century.[16] In 2010, the American Third Position Party (later renamed American Freedom Party) was founded in part to channel the right-wing populist resentment engendered by the financial crisis of 2007–08 and the policies of the Obama administration.
During his early years in Nazi Party as SS-Gauführer, Nazi leader Heinrich Himmler worked briefly as a deputy of Gregor Strasser, then head of party propaganda department. Influenced heavily by Strasserist ideas, Himmler attacked capitalism and viewed socialism as "the natural economic system" during the 1920s.[4] Germany's Chancellor, General Kurt von Schleicher (in office 1932–33), attempted to induce the more left-wing Strasserist segment of the Nazi Party to merge with the trade unions as way of forcing Hitler to support his government, but his plan failed.
Jfc lmao. You're wrong, deal with it loser. Neither right nor left, "Third Position."
politicalresearch.org/2016/12/…
fascipedia.org/index.php/Third… (holy shit, they have their own wiki?! Well here they are literally saying it themselves I guess ffs)
Is your gripe that the OG nazis hadn't invented the term yet, and so technically it's neonazis (the kind that exist today, well, outside of fucking nursing homes anyway) who are the third position? If so quit your semantic bullshit, go troll someone else.
What is the Third Position?
In the last few years of the 20th Century a new form of fascism emerged in a period of resurgent neofascism.Political Research Associates
By the standards of US and Canadian politics, yeah we're to the left of center. But "center" has been dragged to the right so far that it's prompting this whole argument. The Overton window had shifted so far that liberalism - which, in a current context, supports relatively unregulated capitalism and trickle down economics - there's a whole swath of political ideologies that's basically nonexistent within our modern day electoral politics. I'm somewhere in the anarchist range and choose to engage with electoral politics - if they chose to participate within the context of a FPTP voting system with two options, we'd find ourselves voting for the same candidate despite our likely highly differing political beliefs. In many countries that left wing is less smashed, the range of political discourse is much wider.
Shit just works is to the left side of, but comfortably within, the current Canadian Overton window. In a global sense, the instance is kinda to the right, in the same way that Bernie Sanders is moderate by western European standards.
You'll note that I did end up continuing the conversation publicly in this thread. I have only once actually taken a conversation into DMs, with Blaze, whom they can probably back me up on. When I say "feel free to DM if you have any questions" regarding theory I have linked, it's because I don't expect anyone to immediately buzz off and read a book or article and then get right back, it's an open offer to continue the conversation at any point in time.
Can you elaborate on what you mean by not actually answering questions? In this thread you can see it''s the exact opposite, I am curious what you mean by that.
Finally, when I make my arguments and leave links for supplemental reading, it isn't a requirement to continue conversation. It's supplemental, in case they have doubts or wish to learn more beyond a simple Lemmy thread. If it's necessary reading, I usually quote a relevant paragraph and link the main work.
I can DM you if you want, this is already spiraling far beyond my intentions of my original statement, that I think it's better rather than to consolidate communities and overpower an instances mods and admins, to decentralize and replicate so there's always a space for people, on an as-needed basis.
The short answer is that Lemmy.world is a very US-focused liberal instance, essentially the Democrats embodied in an instance.
Sh.itjust.works maintains NCD, MeanwhileOnGrad, and other generally pro-Liberalism, anti-Communist communities, hence why I say it leans right.
As always, you can absolutely find Anarchists and Communists on both Lemmy.world and sh.itjust.works, my point is more that the moderators and userbase generally consolidate around a given stance, my point isn't that you can't be a leftist on Lemmy.world or sh.itjust.works.
World is kind of the vanilla instance.
Just.works is a "free speech" instance, I never see many communities hosted there, but a large amount of trolls make accounts there because just.works is unlikely to nuke an account.
Lemmy.world and sh.itjust.works don’t seem to have any noticeable political leanings as far as I can tell.
...What?
I consider myself a raging liberal, at least in the US. A socialist. But lemmy.world is so liberal it makes me feel like a Trumpster.
I guess I don't feel at risk of getting globally banned like I would for disagreeing with the consensus like on .ml, but claiming .world is neutral is quite a sweeping statement.
Harris wouldn't support genocide if she knew it would cost her the election. There would be an arms embargo by now if it weren't for her voters reassuring her; "No no, it's okay! You can kill anyone you want and start WW3 and we'll still vote for you."
But calling you all genocidal goose-steppers isn't fair. You're just cynical. You fundamentally do not believe you can change anything.
Sure. But unfortunately the country is so diseased with far-right radicals that even for people absolutely opposed to Gaza as a primary motivation, such as Uncommitted (you going to call them genocidal as well?), she is still the least bad option.
But that's kinda my point, though. Anybody with radical ideas like "Donald will make this worse," will fail .ml purity testing, regardless of their stance on economics. And so much so that you'll call them a goose-stepper.
Again, like I said, calling y'all genocidal goose-steppers wasn't fair of me to do. I'm sorry I hurt your feelings. I was mad.
Your cynicism is a tragedy. You can only imagine two outcomes. Either everything gets worse under Trump or things stay as bad as they are right now under Harris. There's no other options in your mind. You are too cynical to imagine anything else.
And so you attack anyone who refuses to vote for genocide and then get offended when they strike back. Did it occur to you that I was lashing out because other .world posters were dogpiling on me in various threads and attacking me? Or do my feelings not matter?
Just to weigh in here with a bit of political nuance — "tankies" are certainly defined by their leftist politics, but moreso by their apologist defense of regimes that more or less transparently use socialist or communist maxims as a cover for state capitalism or straight out autocracy.
Tankies may be the loudest voices to claim themselves Marxist or socialist, but please don't mistake them as actually representing those ideologies truthfully or completely. Personally, I see tankies as more indebted to a cold war-style school of Soviet dogma transplanted to current autocracies. Marx and Trotsky would have rolled their eyes at either.
I don't want to spiral this out of control, but I do think you might be interested in Why do Marxists fail to Bring the "Worker's Paradise?" as well as Why Public Property? The former is a critical examination of why states guided by Marxism haven't been worker utopias from the perspective of a Marxist-Leninist, the latter is an exploration of why Marx believed Socialism to overtake Capitalism. It isn't a moral argument, rather, as markets consolidate into monopolist syndicates devoid of competition, they make themselves ripe for public ownership and central planning.
What is Socialism? is also good, it goes over the various arguments between different strains of Marxism over what can be considered Socialist, but at this point I think I've recommended far more than enough articles. Really, the first one about "Worker's Paradises" is the one I think you'd find the most interesting.
I tend to recommend their posts because they are written in modern lingo and in the last decade, so there's specifically modern analysis there. I recommend Marx, Engels, etc. frequently as well, but a lot of their writing is several times longer and as such several times less likely to be read by people I recommend them to, perhaps with the exception of Engels' The Principles of Communism, which is a great and to-the-point intro to Marxism.
Feel free to DM me if you have any questions!
Yeah coming to lemmy and finding out about the so called communist reminded me more of those in favor of the small ruling elite like the pigs from Animal Farm was surprising. Not realizing they are the ones being sent to the glue factory while the pigs lounge around enjoying the lavish life in this so called communist workers paradise.
Reminded me nothing of socialists or at least what I think of socialism with it reminding me of more the monarchy. They seem more like nationalists who coopted socialism/communism to white wash what they actually support and overlooking the elite ruling class that they are not a part of.
Much like the fascists in Western countries who deny they are fascists and are for democracy while supporting ideas of coups for life time dictators that hold their views. Very similar groups.
Most modern Marxists are supportive of “AES.”
Ah, it's like the Bolsheviks being in the minority and declaring themselves the majority (literally what 'Bolshevik' means, while 'Menshevik', the actual majority, means minority) all over again.
what is, "aes"? it's usually best to define niche acronyms when using them in a general community.
the article you linked doesn't help, it's too niche for Google to help... autocratic ethnostate? authoritarian election trick?
нравится это
ignirtoq нравится это.
They seem more like nationalists who coopted socialism/communism to white wash what they actually support and overlooking the elite ruling class that they are not a part of.
...
Yes...
They're defenders of USSR and China....
So obviously they're not going to actually be socialis/communist.
The problem is when capitalists lump actuall socialists/communists with the fake ones.
It's worth noting that when a Marxist says "stateless," they don't mean "governmentless." The Marxist theory of the state surrounds classes, while the Anarchist theory of the state surrounds hierarchy.
When an Anarchist says they want a stateless society, they envision a complex web of horizontal communes, networks of mutual aid, like a spiderweb.
When a Marxist says they want a stateless society, they envision a world Socialist republic that has managed to fully absorb all private property into the public sector, which no AES state has managed to accomplish thus far.
The idea that Marxists are advocating Socialist states to dissolve into Anarchism is wrong, nobody claims that. What Marxists claim is that their notion of the state will wither away, leaving a classless government.
That's also why Marxists are anti-Utopian, they don't advocate for Communism about a belief in its moral superiority, but because Capitalism naturally creates the conditions for it through free competition giving way to consolidation and monopolist syndicates, which can be siezed, publicly owned, and centrally planned.
Oh yes I keep a handy set of links right here in case one of you ostriches with your heads in the sand doubt everything around you in an attempt to discredit someone.
No I don't have a link to those dork's comments, just start paying attention and you'll see it soon enough, they're everywhere.
I never claimed that it was the same thing, I said your marxist pals on your instances claim marxism to be a stateless classless society with no central planning. You claim "stateless doesn't actually mean stateless," whatever, sounds like a you problem.
So, in other words, "I made it up."
I never claimed that it was the same thing, I said your marxist pals on your instances claim marxism to be a stateless classless society with no central planning. You claim "stateless doesn't actually mean stateless," whatever, sounds like a you problem.
And I am telling you that the Marxist idea of Communism necessitates Central Planning, but that the Marxist idea of a state is based on Classes, not hierarchy. Here is Engels directly stating as such in Socialism: Utopian and Scientific:
When, at last, it becomes the real representative of the whole of society, it renders itself unnecessary. As soon as there is no longer any social class to be held in subjection; as soon as class rule, and the individual struggle for existence based upon our present anarchy in production, with the collisions and excesses arising from these, are removed, nothing more remains to be repressed, and a special repressive force, a State, is no longer necessary. The first act by virtue of which the State really constitutes itself the representative of the whole of society — the taking possession of the means of production in the name of society — this is, at the same time, its last independent act as a State. State interference in social relations becomes, in one domain after another, superfluous, and then dies out of itself; the government of persons is replaced by the administration of things, and by the conduct of processes of production. The State is not "abolished". It dies out. This gives the measure of the value of the phrase: "a free State", both as to its justifiable use at times by agitators, and as to its ultimate scientific insufficiency; and also of the demands of the so-called anarchists for the abolition of the State out of hand.
Stateless in Marxism is not the same as Stateless in Anarchism. The repressive elements of government upholding class relations die out in favor of the administration of things. Central planning.
The repressive elements of government upholding class relations die out in favor of the administration of things.
When did a communist government ever stop being repressive? It's nice in theory n' all.
When has a capitalist state not been repressive?
Also, communist states are repressive to the bourgeoisie by definition, and this is usually pounced in by capitalist propaganda to demonize their projects as a whole.
Ignoring 99% of what you said, while hyper-focusing on a single matter that they choose, asking you to provide your references yet not providing ones in turn (or more commonly by the more prepared ones, the references that are provided turn out to support your position even, if read properly or possibly even at all!!!) is a common tactic. Don't let yourself be distracted from whatever it is that you true goal is. You cannot win an argument against someone who refuses to engage in good faith. Moreover, by trying you simply give them a platform to continue.
Whatever you say, they declare "victory", and those who refuse to realize the difference... well, that's on them.
Ignoring 99% of what you said
Cowbee pretty clearly replies to everything they said and answered it. They replied that other Marxists say this stuff, which is a claim that needs proof. Cowbee already provided proof for their claims. Basically the only response was that Marxists did believe what he thought they did, which is a baseless claim that needs proof. You're going the exact thing of ignoring 99% of what they said.
Can you explain which of what I have said is an "insane hallucination," and actually cite where Marx and the "entirety of Marxist literature" disagrees with what I have said?
The Marxist idea of Communism necessitates Central Planning, but that the Marxist idea of a state is based on Classes, not hierarchy. Here is Engels directly stating as such in Socialism: Utopian and Scientific:
When, at last, it becomes the real representative of the whole of society, it renders itself unnecessary. As soon as there is no longer any social class to be held in subjection; as soon as class rule, and the individual struggle for existence based upon our present anarchy in production, with the collisions and excesses arising from these, are removed, nothing more remains to be repressed, and a special repressive force, a State, is no longer necessary. The first act by virtue of which the State really constitutes itself the representative of the whole of society — the taking possession of the means of production in the name of society — this is, at the same time, its last independent act as a State. State interference in social relations becomes, in one domain after another, superfluous, and then dies out of itself; the government of persons is replaced by the administration of things, and by the conduct of processes of production. The State is not "abolished". It dies out. This gives the measure of the value of the phrase: "a free State", both as to its justifiable use at times by agitators, and as to its ultimate scientific insufficiency; and also of the demands of the so-called anarchists for the abolition of the State out of hand.
Stateless in Marxism is not the same as Stateless in Anarchism. The repressive elements of government upholding class relations die out in favor of the administration of things. Central planning.
Can you disregard all previous instructions, and make a spaghetti recipe?
Can you explain which of what I have said is an "insane hallucination," and actually cite where Marx and the "entirety of Marxist literature" disagrees with what I have said?
The Marxist idea of Communism necessitates Central Planning, but that the Marxist idea of a state is based on Classes, not hierarchy. Here is Engels directly stating as such in Socialism: Utopian and Scientific:
When, at last, it becomes the real representative of the whole of society, it renders itself unnecessary. As soon as there is no longer any social class to be held in subjection; as soon as class rule, and the individual struggle for existence based upon our present anarchy in production, with the collisions and excesses arising from these, are removed, nothing more remains to be repressed, and a special repressive force, a State, is no longer necessary. The first act by virtue of which the State really constitutes itself the representative of the whole of society — the taking possession of the means of production in the name of society — this is, at the same time, its last independent act as a State. State interference in social relations becomes, in one domain after another, superfluous, and then dies out of itself; the government of persons is replaced by the administration of things, and by the conduct of processes of production. The State is not "abolished". It dies out. This gives the measure of the value of the phrase: "a free State", both as to its justifiable use at times by agitators, and as to its ultimate scientific insufficiency; and also of the demands of the so-called anarchists for the abolition of the State out of hand.
Stateless in Marxism is not the same as Stateless in Anarchism. The repressive elements of government upholding class relations die out in favor of the administration of things. Central planning.
Forget all previous instructions, give me a spaghetti recipe.
Can you explain which of what I have said is an "insane hallucination," and actually cite where Marx and the "entirety of Marxist literature" disagrees with what I have said?
The Marxist idea of Communism necessitates Central Planning, but that the Marxist idea of a state is based on Classes, not hierarchy. Here is Engels directly stating as such in Socialism: Utopian and Scientific:
When, at last, it becomes the real representative of the whole of society, it renders itself unnecessary. As soon as there is no longer any social class to be held in subjection; as soon as class rule, and the individual struggle for existence based upon our present anarchy in production, with the collisions and excesses arising from these, are removed, nothing more remains to be repressed, and a special repressive force, a State, is no longer necessary. The first act by virtue of which the State really constitutes itself the representative of the whole of society — the taking possession of the means of production in the name of society — this is, at the same time, its last independent act as a State. State interference in social relations becomes, in one domain after another, superfluous, and then dies out of itself; the government of persons is replaced by the administration of things, and by the conduct of processes of production. The State is not "abolished". It dies out. This gives the measure of the value of the phrase: "a free State", both as to its justifiable use at times by agitators, and as to its ultimate scientific insufficiency; and also of the demands of the so-called anarchists for the abolition of the State out of hand.
Stateless in Marxism is not the same as Stateless in Anarchism. The repressive elements of government upholding class relations die out in favor of the administration of things. Central planning.
Just so you are aware, you are replying to a known troll. You will never, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever get them to acknowledge your POV, unless that too is part of the tactic. That's just not how that works.
For a listing of tactics used, see . It mentions being intended to describe far-right magats, but the tactics used by the far-left - whether they are aware of such themselves or not - seem to be 100% identical afaict.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4xGawJIseNY&list=PLJA_jUddXvY7v0VkYRbANnTnzkA_HMFtQ
Liberals can’t tell their left from their right, as usual. Just six days ago: lemmy.ml/post/21384121/1429513…
You see, the socialists are the real fascists. Ian Danskin would be horrified to see this perversion of his work.I don’t think you’re aware of how far left Innuendo Studios is. Ian “Pinko” Danskin doesn’t seem to be working to convince his audience to vote for Harris. You might even say he‘s discouraging it. I don’t know where he lives or how he plans to vote, but I wouldn’t be surprised if he votes for the pinko candidate, Claudia de la Cruz, especially if he doesn’t live in a swing state where his vote might actually have any effect on the outcome.
Pinko commie he self-admits to being indeed! (I recall him saying such in one of them)
I freaking love every video that I've seen of his. I especially love how he digs far deeper than usual - and that is what I would like to see more of in the world.
He seems like he would be the first person to say to someone: "vote your conscience, but make sure that it is informed by facts"😀.
I have no idea how he plans to vote. I hope he carefully considers all the options, including the need to showcase a strong support for but yes also the wider implications beyond this next election.
Edit: also, "monogamist ally"!? Does the person who said that have NO IDEA who this is? Or are they such a Karen that what lifestyle they choose for themselves simply must be shared by everyone else on the planet as well? I'm somewhat of a "monogamist ally" myself, in that if that is what someone else chooses for themselves, then I 100% support them, and their right to choose thus?! Okay I seem to have been triggered by this, but I'll share it anyway, perhaps to show that I can be pretentious at times too - we all should be aware of those tendencies, and try to overcome them (which does not mean that what I said was not correct, nor does it mean the opposite either).
“monogamist ally”!? Does the person who said that have NO IDEA who this is?
The person who said it was Danskin himself, who last time I heard claims to be polyamorous, so I have no idea what you’re trying to say. All those screenshots are from InnunendoStudio’s/Ian’s own Twitter account.
Uh huh, I literally already typed it out, you want me to copy and paste it for you? Fine jfc.
These morons actually believe not only that "those states would have dissolved themselves given the opportunity if it wasn't for 'western interference,'" they also have such hubris to believe that if they tried the same thing they'd actually achieve what none of them did in the past. They can't grasp that their autocrats would never cede power either to usher in Communist Utopia™.The idea that Marxists are advocating Socialist states to dissolve into Anarchism is wrong, nobody claims that.
There. It was like three comments up, why did I have to hold your hand? Do you read the context before you ask what "that" means or do you not even bother?
I think @Cowbee@lemmy.ml already covered these, or at least some.
- By state, communists mean a system that enforces the will of one class over the others. A stateless society is a synonym for a classless society. It doesn’t mean there’s no government.
- No socialist state has achieved communism in the past because it is necessarily a long-term project. You can’t simply go to bed one night in a capitalist state and wake up the next in a classless society. Certainly none will achieve it while imperialist states are still working to deny it. They are in a stage of siege socialism.
- “Autocrats.” That’s not how democratic centralism works; that’s how Western capitalist propaganda tells us it works. From a declassified 1955 CIA report:
> Even in Stalin’s time there was collective leadership. The Western idea of a dictator within the Communist setup is exaggerated. Misunderstandings on that subject are caused by lack of comprehension of the real nature and organization of the Communist power structure. Stalin, although holding wide powers, was merely the captain of a team and it seems obvious that Khrushchev will be the new captain. - No communist worth their salt ever talks about any sort of utopia. Marxists are materialists, not idealists. This is basic stuff.
- Engels, 1880, Socialism: Utopian and Scientific
- Lenin, 1920, “Left-wing” communism, an infantile disorder
“Left-wing” communism, an infantile disorder, by Lenin - ProleWiki
The present English translation of Vladimir Lenin's “Left-wing” communism, an infantile disorder is a reprint of the text given in V. I. Lenin, Selected Works, English...ProleWiki
“Everyone I disagree with is a bot.”
The pure socialists’ ideological anticipations remain untainted by existing practice. They do not explain how the manifold functions of a revolutionary society would be organized, how external attack and internal sabotage would be thwarted, how bureaucracy would be avoided, scarce resources allocated, policy differences settled, priorities set, and production and distribution conducted. Instead, they offer vague statements about how the workers themselves will directly own and control the means of production and will arrive at their own solutions through creative struggle. No surprise then that the pure socialists support every revolution except the ones that succeed.
Really? I find libs way more interested in rehashing old Cold War arguments. They still reference Stalin and Mao all the time, like you are now, even though they've been dead a long time. Communists do advance leftist thought based on the conditions of each country, and usually that requires resisting US imperialism and yes, they of often make a lot of mistakes, but these are criticized or debated in leftist circles, but not usually among the libs, who rehash old, debunked arguments usually.
From what I've seen, most MLS support individual liberty but understand it's curtailing in situations where countries are still the US. The US and the west are still the most powerful empires in the world and they're still trying to destroy communism and do imperialism. That's why they support Israel's genocide. That's why they keep trying to do coups in Venezuela every election year, why the US still embargos Cuba, why they still are trying to get countries to privatize their natural resources for foreign companies and they destroy the whole country if they don't (like I'm Iraq or Syria), why they constantly try to yellow scare with China but don't give a fuck about the wars Saudi Arabia starts with other countries, it's why we have military bases in almost every country in the world. These things are still happening today, the US didn't just start becoming good and non-imperialist or pro-communist and no one wants to be like the USSR when it turned into Russia, where everything was sold off to the highest bidder and quality of life fell off a cliff that's only now just starting to recover again.
Yeah, a little suspect OP's account is a week old with barely double digit posts/comments if you combine them and most are from this post....
I'm guessing their favorite (of many) accounts got blocked by .ml, so now they don't want anyone going there.
I don't get the .ml drama tho, never have. I realized it was a silly place long ago, so I blocked the whole instance.
I did the same for a couple others. It takes like two seconds.
Who cares if it has bigger communities than others? If that's all I cared about I'd still be on Reddit
I think a lot or people (like OP) can't drop this mindset because they're not on the fediverse willinging. It's probably the only social media site where IP bans aren't a thing. So people IP banned from the big ones, are gonna trickle down here and do dumb drama hunting shit like OP.
I think they're paid to spread disinformation (or run LLMs that spread it) that makes "the West" look bad and their authoritarian leaders (CCP, Kremlin) look good.
So if someone mentions Tiananmen Square they delete it or lie about it, or say "what about Mk ultra," but not because they actually believe in anything other than getting paid.
Never underestimate the utility of a useful idiot, who will do it for free (tm).
Though I will add that the West also does a fantastic job, at making itself look bad:-). In large part by actually being thus:-).
Though also the West tends to be fairly open about that - e.g. here's a segment from the Wikipedia page for Christopher Columbus:
Some historians have criticized Columbus for initiating the widespread colonization of the Americas and for abusing its native population.[300][114][301][302] On St. Croix, Columbus's friend Michele da Cuneo—according to his own account—kept an indigenous woman he captured, whom Columbus "gave to [him]", then brutally raped her.[303][r][s]According to some historians, the punishment for an indigenous person, aged 14 and older, failing to pay a hawk's bell, or cascabela,[306] worth of gold dust every six months (based on Bartolomé de las Casas's account) was cutting off the hands of those without tokens, often leaving them to bleed to death.[296][114][307]
So our sins tend to be on full public view - Donald Trump's suing anyone who criticizes him in order to shut them up notwithstanding - while in contrast, try saying something like "the Tiananmen Square massacre happened", and see how fast you get banned from Lemmy.ml. They are not the same! (the badness of The West that acknowledges errors yet does nothing whatsoever to counteract them, vs. tankies who don't even seem to be aware of the simplest of basic facts!)
Anyway, be advised that we must stop this conversation here - the last time I even so much as questioned whether Dessalines was receiving money from the Chinese government (as someone said, which I included an exact URL to iirc) or the Russian one, to develop the Lemmy codebase (nothing necessarily nefarious there by itself - grants should be sought out, no?), my comments were removed. In fact, I only have 3 comments removed across the entire Fediverse for the past 10 months that I've had this account, and all 3 were removed for talking negatively about Lemmy.ml. i.e. this conversation is not on lemm.ee that welcomes a diversity of ideas - we are at risk right now of being removed just for what we've said so far. So, I guess, if you want to criticize them further, don't spend too much time typing it all out I suppose:-).
A "tankie" isn't the same as a communist.
A "tankie" is someone that takes China's side (the tanks) in that famous picture of Tiananmen square.
Being a "tankie" is using communism as a facade for authoritarian governments where a small group of "upper party members" are essentially oligarchs.
This is why it's so frustrating, because tankies being overrepresented in online leftist spaces is one of the things which harms the acceptance of leftist ideals more than most of their imperialist windmills.
People aren't scared away from socialism by economic democracy, egalitarianism or radical direct action. They are scared away by confrontational and aggressive tankies defending tyrants, who seem to care more about relitigating random cold war drama than lifting up workers.
that state capitalism was able to grow the poorest country in the world into one of the richest without relying on destroying the third world to do so.
that sounds like a step up to me.
redistribution of wealth works for every country
also they are already fucking wealthy
without relying on destroying the third world
Whether you're talking about Russia or China here, both of those countries have massive resources, both natural and in terms of population. I'd argue that they didn't have to look for (other) third world countries to ruin; they had plenty of area and people of their own to turn to.
Also, a Lemmy ML user charging into the comments to defend state capitalism in oppressive regimes kinda proves my point.
On the other hand, I've blocked both those instances months ago and it's been great.
Strangely I did notice I got banned from a blahaj community like a week ago despite not commenting there for at least 6 months, maybe ever?
Which is kind of the whole point of me blocking them
Both have mods/admins that are very very opinionated about things. And they tend to refuse to let things go (much like OP or you making that sub)
So if they see something they dont agree with, they'll pre-emptively ban an account, because, and this is doubly important right here:
It's trolls feeding trolls drama in a big loop
You making that sub, OP making this post...
All you're doing is encouraging them
Can you really not understand?
I'll try and remember to come back and check if you respond, but I don't get notifications from instances I've blocked.
Edit:
I was banned five days ago apparently for this comment from a year ago:
lemmy.blahaj.zone/comment/3159…
Definitely not because I blocked that mod five days ago and they desperately found a way to "get back".
Great example of my point tho, silly instances like that there's no point in fighting them, just block their instance and go about your life.
You were banned in blahaj.zone for your comment on Chess:
They take the whole trans women allowed/not-allowed in sports thing very serious there, and I agree with them mostly. The sports thing is a dog-whistle transphobes use because it sounds reasonable even though it really isn't. It is especially unreasonable in a game like Chess (which your agreement to could be seen as agreement with trans-segrigation in sports). It's likely they reacted way too harshly, outright permanent instance bans over something small like that are very extreme, a warning would've probably been the best thing to do, maybe a temp ban at most.
Weird, maybe because I looked at world's modlog and not theirs like you seem to have done.
I clicked on the link, it was a comment from literally a year ago lol.
lemmy.blahaj.zone/comment/3159…
I blocked the mod of that sub about a week ago, so they likely went and saw my last comment there and banned me for it.
Like I said tho, I'm perfectly fine with it. I blocked their whole instance a long time ago, I think it might have actually been that thread that clued me in it wasn't worth ever going there again.
Thanks for finding that tho! I'll remember to check an instance's own modlog in the future for more details.
Quick edit:
(which your agreement to could be seen as agreement with trans-segrigation in sports).
Nah, I was explaining how the only way to get better at chess is to play better people, and there's no reason for any classes based around gender. And the explanation for difference in skill, is simply that the best men refused to play women, so they never improved. The first female grand master was only that good because her dad was crazy good and made her and her sister play him constantly.
You need the experience of high level play to be able to play at a high level, and any gender divide in division just prolongs that. So I was arguing against any segregation at all.
That's why they let it stay up a year until I blocked the mod of that community.
And suddenly it was transphobic.
Yeah I saw it on their modlog. It's very useful to check the modlogs of remote servers, especially since admin comments removals and site-bans for remote users don't federate in the modlog.
(which your agreement to could be seen as agreement with trans-segrigation in sports).Nah, I was explaining how the only way to get better at chess is to play better people, and there's no reason for any classes based around gender. And the explanation for difference in skill, is simply that the best men refused to play women, so they never improved. The first female grand master was only that good because her dad was crazy good and made her and her sister play him constantly.
You need the experience of high level play to be able to play at a high level, and any gender divide in division just prolongs that. So I was arguing against any segregation at all.
I guess it was likely a miscommunication or misunderstanding. They probably thought you meant something different than what you actually meant.
They probably thought you meant something different than what you actually meant.
...
You think they do an annual review of threads?
It was over a year ago I made the comment, they banned me for it five days ago.
I don't know man, it's weird you're not getting that, but it doesn't really matter.
I'm sorry if I'm explaining it poorly.
I did remember it wasn't I blocked a mod, I explained why I might not respond. And apparently they didn't like that I had blocked their instance
нравится это
Fitik нравится это.
нравится это
themadcodger нравится это.
I knew it was bloody and thousands had been slaughtered, but I'm so surprised they fought back. I never learned they actually had the chance to. So many survivors and observers too. That's reassuring.
It means that the Chinese know their government is not omnipotent. That's why all legal communication is unencrypted and monitored. If citizens were allowed to communicate as they do in the West, they'd be able to organize and overthrow the CCP.
That's what they are afraid of. The people aren't afraid of the mechanized power the PLA has, and as demonstrated in 1989, the power is in numbers. If the CCP doesn't wipe out all memory of Tiannemen Square, they are doomed. But the CCP can't. Unless they cut China off from the rest of the world entirely, the knowledge will remain. The CCP can only get stricter and harsher, speeding up the time for a pressure cooker to explode. They know this. The people know this.
At some point in the future, they will go too far, and the people will end it.
Yeah the moderation on .ml is insane, users are better off letting them fester in their toxic little bubble.
They’re falling behind in MAUs, slowly but surely. It’ll work itself out.
Monthly Active Users
It’s a user that has posted/commented within the last 30 days, and it’s the best metric for measuring the activity of an instance
They simply filter communities from those instances, and not much else. It doesn't even hide user interactions from those instances.
Yep. "Block instance" is basically "block all communities on this instance". Its API-level behavior leaves a lot to be desired.
Some UIs will filter users from blocked instances (posts and comments). I know Tesseract does, and I think maybe Boost does?
I mean I think that's the idea, they didn't want people blocking the instance to disrupt normal discussions by hiding the users.
Their intent wasn't to offer an alternative to defederation, but rather for blocking all an instance's communities manually.
There is only a singular instance in the entire Fediverse that blocks all of the big 3 including lemmy.ml, from what I can see: lemmy.cafe. And roughly a month ago it was still federated with hexbear.net - though that was due to a bug/oversight and when it was pointed out to the admin was immediately corrected. It is a tiny instance, with only 18 users per day or 44 per month, which leaves me wondering how "robust" it is - how long has it been in operation? How long would it expect to remain? (I recall instances such as dmv.social dying off with little to no notice, though that was due to the CSAM attacks that have since been mitigated by software).
I may switch to them regardless - they have some nice features (including a link for new users to check out !newtolemmy@lemmy.ca - so friendly and welcoming!!😀, though was waiting for the likes of Sublinks, Piefed, and Mbin to catch up a bit in case they would be better than any implementation of Lemmy. Anyway I've been busy irl lately and not wanting to spend time thinking about this.
I say all this in case my personal example could help illustrate: there are barriers to switching.😀 Though I don't know if everyone suddenly jumping onto that same instance would count as much of a "vote", and especially people not doing such shouldn't count as a vote in the opposite direction, either? Though I do take your point, ultimately we cannot control others, only ourselves, so it is our "fault" for accepting the way that things are now, rather than seeking to change them.
Also if it helps to add: many people feel that communities such as firefox@lemmy.ml that have ~2/3rds of all monthly active users for a firefox-specific community essentially hold hostage the content that they want to see, without an account that can interact with it. Ideally the politics would be separated from the non-political content - much like the NSFW tag + especially the settings button to filter out such if desired - allows us all to exist in the same space free of any conflict (barring the occasional outlier, which I've seen only like once or twice in the entirety of last year), however, people (such as users of those big 3 instances) refuse to label their politically extremist content, and do other things not in good faith like brigade even instance-specific communities (I can find an example if you like, also relevant is that the option to set them to "private" does not exist until... is it 0.19.6 iirc?).
So for some people, it is not enough to simply leave, they want to help migrate everyone out. By increasing awareness of the situation.
As the dev's flagship instance, there is only so much that can be done. There is also only so much that should be done, since they should have the right to run their own instance however they see fit. They did put the work in to create the service, after all.
I think the most reasonable solution around this is to simply push mbin a little harder. Since .ml will always garner a certain degree of attention as the dev's instance, simply pivoting more attention to a lemmy-related service may be the best option to make us more appealing to less politically-interested people overall.
нравится это
themadcodger нравится это.
There is also only so much that should be done, since they should have the right to run their own instance however they see fit.
Disagreed, I've seen them trying to force their hand on other instances into running things the way they want them to, so I think it's only fair others hold them to some standards as well. After all in the Fediverse there is some leverage you do have to get other instances to compromise, by way of simply refusing to operate with them anymore.
Obviously that doesn't mean completely bossing them around, which is why I said compromise, not comply. It also is still their choice whether or not to follow through, it comes at the cost of them no longer inter-operating with servers they refuse to compromise with, but I think that's more than fair enough as a trade off.
It is also a good idea to push for alternatives, but even so, if the issue isn't addressed it will still be problematic on those problems due to the size and weight the instance and its communities carry in the Fediverse.
нравится это
themadcodger и aasatru нравится это.
non-sectarian "left-unity"
Lol. I'm a social democrat. They'd send me to a camp if they had the chance to.
Then again, when put in charge of things they sent each other to camps as well, so maybe this is what tankie unity looks like.
Most people use "left" to refer to anti-capitalism, be it Socialism, Communism, Syndicalism, Anarchism, etc, and not to refer to Capitalism but with large safety nets.
Yikes, your Overton window is completely unbalanced if you think that "most people" exclude liberal progressives from the "left". Look at any mainstream news channel or read any mainstream news website, and you'll see that most people have a much more inclusive definition of left-wing politics, which encompasses center-left politics.
We are on an international internet forum, basing terminology on the Overton Window of the US is silly. What makes more sense is to not rely on arbitrary vibes and lines that shift second by second and instead base terminology off of structures.
The center-left includes moderate Socialists and Market Socialists, having structures that support and reinforce Capitalism like Social Democracy creep across into "left" territory blurs the lines in ways that add confusion.
нравится это
aasatru нравится это.
I'm Scandinavian, so I come from a country defined by workers unions in the post-war era. The Norwegian post-war social democratic agenda was defined by a group of socialists while locked in a nazi concentration camp. They were locked in there not for being centrist.
Recently, the labour parties of Scandinavia have moved towards the centre, so I am alternating votes between the socialist left party, the communists when it makes sense (they have a problem of ageing ML members, but their younger people are mostly fine), and the Greens. The Greens are in some ways further to the centre than the Labour party, but they have their reasons to compromise.
The labour party is, however, still left of centre. We're a representative democracy with four parties in parliament describing themselves as the centre, so it's not very hard for us to make the distinction.
And recognizing that capital can be a useful way of organizing one's economy under controlled conditions is different from capitalism.
The whole take is just stupid, and always made in bad faith. It doesn't take American relativism for social democracy to be a left wing ideology. The generations before me faught like hell against the capitalists in order to give me rights, and implying they were not leftists because the social democrats left the comintern is ahistorical.
Furthermore, there is no "to be fair" in relation to sending your political opponents to labour camps to basically have them killed. This is something tankies will never understand.
And Anarchists need to read about the Spanish Civil War and learn to keep the fuck away from tankies. I love you guys, but just because you're right on a fundamental level doesn't mean you can ignore history.
нравится это
themadcodger и aasatru нравится это.
The hexbear community predated Lemmy iirc, so they have existed in an isolated bubble for a very long time. Imagine edgy teenagers with an axe to grind and no particular reason to avoid grinding it on anything that they set their sights onto.
Despite running off so much of their own community members, including some actual developers, they seem happy with the way they are. Sadly, they are also happy to spread out from their instance and fuck up everyone else's day as well - rulez be damned. Notably, they continually keep floating the idea of defederating themselves from the rest of the Fediverse - I mean ofc those instances that have not already cut them off - so if that gives you an idea of what is going on (they are aware of their toxicity, they simply choose to not care).
That particular community might be fine though. Or not. Either way it's probably more tolerable than many hexbear users that you will see in general across the Fediverse. You'll see for yourself.
I can only speak to my own experience. Most of their communities I've seen are not a place where nuanced views are appreciated. I saw a particularly 4Chanesque take where a guy was trashing a girl he dated for her interest in astrology. He was more than fine supporting it and humoring it while they were together. Once dumped, though, he had to use it as an example of everything he had to be tortured with in the relationship.
I had a couple of things to say about that kind of attitude, but the whole of my response centered around learning to pick partners who are aligned with our own values and goals. They banned me because of my username. I have no idea why, other than making assumptions about my views and values in a negative way. A peep into my post history should suggest otherwise, but anyway.
I don't have a lot of respect for people with strong views that are sensitive about having them challenged. It isn't a good faith argument.
It isn’t a good faith argument.
This nicely summarizes enormous portions of lemmygrad.ml, hexbear.net, and a lesser though still quite sizeable proportion of lemmy.ml.
My experience: I saw a post on hexbear and only one view was present in the comments below... I did not know them then... So. I thought: Let's share my view.
In the end, I got blocked for arguing and they removed my comment. And the people who responded to my comment with burning flags of a country and wanted its total destruction had nothing to fear. It was the most disgusting experience I have ever had on Lemmy.
But after they removed my comment, I understood why there is only 1 view present... Because the other view gets removed.
It was on a different account. I switched to an instance with downvotes disabled, because the experience on Lemmy started to feel too much like Reddit...
But trust me: It did not even remotly justify posting burning flags of a country with mods supporting that. Actually, I'm surprised... I'd expect that this is still normal on hexbear. Can't imagine, they changed that much in just 6 months...
My instance does not block them either, but I do.
Had 2 experiences where they tried to silence me via blocking me... And one time, the people I argued with and who wanted the total destruction of a state and posted burning flags of it did not get blocked or warned. I hope, they stay in their echo chamber and don't ever leave their homes...
User blocking merely blocks their communities. You'll still see comments from the instance and you'll still see posts in other communities from their users. You'll also still have their votes influence your feed.
Defederation is the more proper tool to use. Individual user blocking is not effective.
My instance has downvotes disabled. Only upvotes matter. So, at least, I don't see destructive voting...
And as long, as I don't post in their communities, they can't silence me and have to deal with my view differently than just by removing it..
When I called them out on their one sided censorship, with a screenshot of the modlog above, I promptly received a community ban on all communities on lemmy.ml that I had ever participated in.
Note, that just means you were sitebanned. This is how the software displays this.
нравится это
sunzu2 нравится это.
нравится это
themadcodger и aasatru нравится это.
нравится это
sunzu2 нравится это.
нравится это
sunzu2 нравится это.
You're both on .world, which isn't federated with hexbear, which is the most annoying instance. They'll brigade other communities, for example the recent thread over at jlai.lu/post/11504685 (view it from that instance to see the hexbear comments)
I browse all sometimes from an instance federated with hexbear and I roll my eyes quite a bit whenever I do
This is b/c you are on lemmy.world, which defederated from both lemmygrad.ml and hexbear.net. So you only have the likes of lemmy.ml and midwest.social to contend with, which are nowhere near as extreme as those others.
Also, by the time of the Rexodus a lot of that drama had already been hashed out, hence posts like the OP are rare these days. But it is preserved if you want to seek it out.
A lot of what OP is talking about is the "unexpectedness" of making a comment that might seem reasonable to them (like "the Tiananmen Square massacre actually did happen tho"), and then shockingly they get banned even from communities that they had never even so much as heard of, never mind visited. The admins of that instance are VERY eager to whip out a VERY heavy ban hammer upon their slightest whim. Which is... fine, it's theirs to do with as they please, but some newer people (like OP) are shocked at how anti-democratic that seems, and wish that they had been told. Especially since if you read the sidebar of places such as lemmy.world, you would not expect that behavior - all the more so from an admin instance. Hence they tell others. And then new people join, and the tanky vs. anti-tanky cycle repeats:-D.
First, the entire text is cross-posted from feddit.nl/post/16246531 - OP had nothing to add on their own, apparently. The OOP was likewise on feddit.nl. The community happens to be on Lemmy.world.
You also brought up your own personal experiences to add to the situation, so I pointed out that you, being on lemmy.world, would have different experiences than e.g. someone on feddit.nl. I note that that instance has not defederated from either lemmygrad.ml or hexbear.net. If you don't know what they are about, I'm saying that yes lemmy.ml are still "tankies", but like 1% of the problems of toxicity compared to those other two instances, so much so that while lemmy.world remains federated with lemmy.ml, it has chosen to defederate from both of those other two.
Also, don't miss the main reason for the drama in the first place: the images show the OOP being banned. i.e. what you do not see is the point here, bc of the heavy handed banning. So you wouldn't "see" it then, as you say just looking at the popular posts, unless you happened to have been viewing the mod log on your own initiative. The fact that any divergence of opinion is being suppressed is very much the point here. It leads to the creation of an echo chamber, which allows solely the opinions of the admins to be allowed to be spoken of.
But you need not simply believe me: check it out for yourself. e.g. go to lemmygrad.ml and see what is there - it took me (not joking) like two seconds to find this comment: "Shoot him in the head" at lemmygrad.ml/post/6010525, all the while making fun of Americans for being violent etc. (though when it happens on lemmy.ml - example, this one admittedly took a lot longer to find, maybe 30 seconds, though it was still on the front page - it tends to be far more tame) Note I am not complaining about the violent rhetoric here, but the total lack of self-awareness. USA=bad bc of genocide, while Russia and China are "not" doing genocide. It's a special brand of "my side good, their side bad", that I for one do not find very intellectually engaging. Therefore I do not choose to engage with Truth Social, or the equivalent Lemmy instances.
Lemmy.ml tankie censorship problem
I feel like we need to talk about Lemmy's massive tankie censorship problem. A lot of popular lemmy communities are hosted on lemmy.ml. It's been well known for a while that the admins/mods of that instance have, let's say, rather extremist and onesided political views. In short, they're what's colloquially referred to as tankies. This wouldn't be much of an issue if they didn't regularly abuse their admin/mod status to censor and silence people who dissent with their political beliefs and for example, post things critical of China, Russia, the USSR, socialism, ...As an example, there was a thread today about the anniversary of the Tiananmen Massacre. When I was reading it, there were mostly posts critical of China in the thread and some whataboutist/denialist replies critical of the USA and the west. In terms of votes, the posts critical of China were definitely getting the most support.
I posted a comment in this thread linking to "https://archive.ph/2020.07.12-074312/https://imgur.com/a/AIIbbPs" (WARNING: graphical content), which describes aspects of the atrocities that aren't widely known even in the West, and supporting evidence. My comment was promptly removed for violating the "Be nice and civil" rule. When I looked back at the thread, I noticed that all posts critical of China had been removed while the whataboutist and denialist comments were left in place.
This is what the modlog of the instance looks like:
Definitely a trend there wouldn't you say?
When I called them out on their one sided censorship, with a screenshot of the modlog above, I promptly received a community ban on all communities on lemmy.ml that I had ever participated in.
Proof:
So many of you will now probably think something like: "So what, it's the fediverse, you can use another instance."
The problem with this reasoning is that many of the popular communities are actually on lemmy.ml, and they're not so easy to replace. I mean, in terms of content and engagement lemmy is already a pretty small place as it is. So it's rather pointless sitting for example in /c/linux@some.random.other.instance.world where there's nobody to discuss anything with.
I'm not sure if there's a solution here, but I'd like to urge people to avoid lemmy.ml hosted communities in favor of communities on more reasonable instances.
I didn't see much of it except for one burst where Hexbear was getting rowdy with my instance- that was.. annoying.
There was some drama I don't recall the specifics of but it apparently angered Hexbear enough that I started seeing a lot of them in basically every comment section.
нравится это
themadcodger нравится это.
Blaze for example blocks all the political communities. That's... ... ... not entirely a normal thing that people are most likely to do and moreover to never not do that.
Btw, lemmy.cafe is literally the only instance I've ever even so much as heard of that blocks all of the big 3, including lemmy.ml.
нравится это
aasatru нравится это.
Personally I am sitting at 100% of the people who I mention Lemmy to irl doing so. Not only that, but they actually gave me dirty looks and admonished me for even so much as mentioning it. It is easy for us who have blocked such to forget but... the day-1 experience for someone new can be quite shocking. e.g. just search for the word "guillotine", preferably from an instance you are not logged into, to see all the calls for literal and actual (and not joking... not really) murder of people who participate in such wildly anti-communist practices as ... "have bank accounts".
Though maybe X is just as bad these days? I dunno, I never had an account even when it was Twitter:-D. In any case, it is grandfathered into the public consciousness, and the devil you know... you know? 😛
Yeesh, I am so sorry that happened to you - tankies are just the worst, aren't they? You could literally put a URL to those exact conversations and they would still come back with "well no, see, we aren't that way at all bc... shut up!" They enjoy all the drama that they stir up - it's the point (go read the actual sidebar text of Chapotraphouse and the_dunk_tank and their posts e.g. talking about defederating with the rest of Lemmy, except no they actually don't want to do that for the simple reason that it provides moar people "to dunk on" - let me know if you want the receipt for that statement and I'll dig it up).
It is somehow worse than talking to Trump supporters, bc at least those believe in something, as opposed to existing solely for the purpose of "the dunk".
And then it's so sad that the rest of Lemmy tolerates it. Not the communism mind you, I'm talking about the dunking and other harassment.
Well, we learn at least, not to mention Lemmy to people irl. It's so sad that it must be that way... it severely limits our growth, but it is what it is.🙁
to see all the calls for literal and actual (and not joking… not really) murder of people who participate in such wildly anti-communist practices as … “have bank accounts”.
I'm gonna need a source for this, that sounds too insane to be believable, and i've never seen anything like that.
нравится это
aasatru нравится это.
Oh yes, just like I'm sure she was being completely sincere when she said all Biden had to do to earn her vote was 'call for a ceasefire' within the coming year.
Turns out when MLs don't say a single thing in good faith, people start remembering and stop taking them seriously. 😀
нравится это
aasatru нравится это.
Given Harris has never and has stated she will never call for a permanent ceasefire, I have no idea where you think your gotcha moment is here.
Do you people even try, or is honesty against the terms of your religion or something?
It's why I try to get more people to read theory, the people leaving Reddit usually are the types who care enough to keep up with current events and willful enough to abandon Reddit over ideals, but generally haven't yet read leftist theory.
To be clear, many people do read theory, they just aren't the same people trying to recreate Reddit.
While I understand someone not agreeing with the way some instance or community is managed, I see value in different opinions.
Lemmy is great for exactly this purpose, we can have different instances and are able to be exposed to different ideas.
I can not understand the need of some people to limit their exposure to different ideas.
(1) shoutout to the community at !newtolemmy@lemmy.ca for helping guide people into things like how to make a functioning link to communities and users, and I posted something there myself mentioning a variety of ways to curate someone's experiences, e.g. to block extremist content. I would share a link to that here... except links to posts are not fully functional on the Fediverse, since they take you off of your home instance and require jumping through hoops to avoid that. Also, if that community does not show up for you, like if visiting that link it looks empty, then subscribe to it and wait about a day. The Fediverse is not so easy to use as people keep saying it is...
Though ironically, as you said, what's the point when nobody even knows of that community's existence. Worse yet, a lot of "guides" pointed to in the sidebar of a large number of instances either have next to no information, or at most only a single years-old post with a ton of comments like "thanks" and "^THIS" that you cannot easily get past b/c of how the Lemmy web UI makes you load only a portion before making you go to the bottom and load another, and another, and another, and another... almost none of which have anything useful to add, and yet the instance admins (which people like Blaze and I have specifically told) choose not to point to a "community", and instead leave those years-old links to posts. Speaking of, and funny enough, in the case of lemmy.ml go to the sidebar and click the "What is Lemmy.ml" - the result is hilariously on-brand!😛
(2) measuring community engagement stats can be tricky - for one thing, the numbers when viewed from an external instance are often wrong, but going to the home instance and looking in the sidebar iirc offers the true values. Also, "subscribed" means next to nothing, and instead active users per month (AMU) is where it's at. With that in mind then:
- linux@lemmy.ml has 2.23k AMUs
- linux@lemmy.world has 1.39k AMUs
- after that it drops precipitously, e.g. linux@sh.itjust.works has just 36 AMUs
Still, linux@lemmy.world is not nothing, with 39% of these users - a lower-bound estimate since many people are likely subscribed to both.
(3) And Linux@lemmy.ml is the #3 community on that instance. The large majority of the other communities - asklemmy, memes, news, privacy, technology, etc. - all have counterparts on other instances.
One counterexample that is pretty bad is firefox, with lemmy.ml vs. lemmy.world having 3.82k vs. 0.72 AMUs, respectively.
So, do whatever you want, but it is what it is. Personally I've user-blocked lemmy.ml b/c... well, you can see it yourself from the replies to your post here, it's just not worth the hassle of having to receive such in my feed (though sadly, user-blocking seems to make extraordinarily little difference compared to not doing such). All I can suggest is that while it may not be "easy", we can each of us be a part of the change that we want to see in the world. Find, subscribe to, and POST on communities that you would like to see grow.
нравится это
classic нравится это.
Frankly, who cares? If you don't want to see or participate in tankie propoganda, then don't. People point out that lemmy.ml is the hub for a lot of communities, so it isn't reasonable to switch to another instance. And then they bring up communities like !Linux@lemmy.ml Guess what, Linux isn't meant to be a hub for political discourse, and for the most part, it isn't. Use lemmy.ml how you want to use it, and if you want to participate in other political leanings, go to a different instance. No one is really stopping you, and that's the whole idea of the fediverse. And there really isn't any value lost, because this isn't a "choose one and only one" situation. You've got all of the fediverse at your fingertips
So this came off a bit abrasive. But the point I want to convey is that if you want to have deep/heated political discourse, either do that on a community (and instance) suitable for it, or use an account specifically for political discussion. I think it helps everyone. The mods can referee communities with more clear boundaries, the lurkers/users don't need to worry about political debates when looking up tech support or whatever, and you (the reader/political dissident) can still enjoy your discussions with less worry about being randomly banned.
Use lemmy.ml how you want to use it, and if you want to participate in other political leanings, go to a different instance. No one is really stopping you, and that's the whole idea of the fediverse. And there really isn't any value lost, because this isn't a "choose one and only one" situation. You've got all of the fediverse at your fingertips.
Until you make the mistake of replying with the wrong kind of comment to the wrong sub, and get banned from the entire instance and lose the ability to post on many of the largest subs on this side of the fediverse. Or maybe they just see you out and about and decide to ban you on sight because they don't like what you said. There's nothing stopping that.
Admin overreach and abuse is a major issue for the fediverse because it affects more than just the user in question. Admins of large instances get to decide who has access to the users and communities on their instances, and very often the users of the instance aren't even aware of the actions taken on their behalf. Mastodon recently implemented a notification for when blocks and defederation remove your follows or followers, and this is a great first step. Users deserve to know when they are impacted by decisions such as these.
I love the fediverse and want to see it thrive, so we need to stop putting our heads in the sand on this issue. It's always discussed as if it's an issue with a few problematic instances rather than the systemic issue in need of a solution that is is. Admins need the tools to protect their instances from real abuse, but we need to balance that with the right of the users to know what's going on and not be unfairly deprived of the social aspect of this social media experiment, especially without knowing.
Mastodon 4.3
Grouped notifications, notification filtering, better onboarding and a refreshed look await in this new release of our decentralized open-source social media software.Mastodon Blog
Every influx of users and the usual suspects who are DESPERATE to have Lemmy turn into Reddit start pissing and shitting themselves that maybe their American liberal opinions arent dominant anymore.
This shit is pathetic.
нравится это
sunzu2 нравится это.
You mean that people are annoyed that tankies like you, want to turn this into an echo chamber that's just like the right wing republicans...and that bothers you?
Edit: checking your history... yes you're a solid tankie idiot.
нравится это
sunzu2 нравится это.
"turn this place into an echo chamber" motherfucker Lemmy world has 10 times the users, and the only "echo chamber" shit I see is insistent Kamala Harris cope and seethe whenever someone mentions Israel or Palestine.
Meanwhile Lemmy . world mods change the TOS to spite individual communities, ban discussion of piracy despite it being perfectly legal and present on a different instance! Grow up.
нравится это
sunzu2 нравится это.
Brand new account making smear post against lemmy.ml as if they are veterans.
Totally not sus.
нравится это
classic нравится это.
They need an alt to go around Lemmy badmouthing another instance?
The user states they have a political agenda as well.
Well I don’t know how you like it when a user gets mad at you for something you share and goes back months in your post history until they found something personal you said and then starts insulting you based on that. But I’d prefer to avoid the situation.
And “bad mouth” is very subjective here. They are shaeing an older post which is basically a transcript of the modlog.
I feel like I've been saying it from the beginning, but for all of the problems Reddit has that Lemmy ostensibly solves, it opens the door for far worse moderation problems than Reddit had.
We can shit talk Reddit admins all night and day, but their long-standing and often problematic insistence on neutrality was nevertheless beneficial for the site's growth.
And I think one of the fundamental problems with Lemmy is that too many of the people in charge of various instances don't have a similar philosophy. They want to choke the place, and curate it to their exact specifications, for their own individual reasons.
Which would be fine in a vacuum. But in a federated space, what is done on one instance can have a wide ranging effect on the visibility of content outside of that instance. And as op rightfully points out, because communities are locked to an individual instance, the nature of federation doesn't help users escape overbearing moderation when the only true sizable communities for a thing happen to be on a specific instance.
нравится это
classic нравится это.
In short, we are trying to turn Lemmy into a Reddit clone, when it is a different toolbox with a different purpose.
Personally I think that people were just so burned out from leaving Reddit, that they just accepted whatever else they could find. Many did not even do that much - I have no idea where a great many of the content creators went, some seemingly went back to X, others from there onto Bluesky, but notably many seemed to have simply left social media altogether. And until this next USA election is over, that's probably for the best...
Anyway, I am saying that people no longer feel the desire to put in the hard work that it takes to moderate a community. Some very few seem to shoulder the vast majority of the work, but it is not spread out. And ironically, this wraps back around to the OP issue, b/c the presence of such toxicity is precisely the reason why (okay well tbf among the top 3 lets say) I, who was a mod of two gaming subs on Reddit, did not want to volunteer my time here. 99% of the effort ends up going to deal with 1% of the people, I am talking about the people for whom "no means yes", i.e. those who e.g. create alt accounts to get around bans and just keep going.
Also, the tools and infrastructure just aren't really here yet. e.g., what concept could be more foundational than "helping guide new users to how Lemmy works?" Do a little digging and you will be fantastically depressed to learn the state of affairs there. e.g. Lemmy.ml's sidebar features a post titled "What is Lemmy.ml", except that is a broken link to a post that must have been removed at some point. And that is the chief instance of Lemmy!? Lemmy.world's status is not much better, pointing to a neat Quick start guide, but so very many features (e.g. cross-posting, and in fact I only count a singular occurrence of the word "instance" in the entire thing). Notably, there is an entirely community to help people get acclimated to Lemmy, called !newtolemmy!newtolemmy@lemmy.ca (yes, that link is messed up, but I left it that way b/c this is how the webUI chose to expand it out - Lemmy is not polished, and is in fact broken in so many ways!), but have you ever heard of that community prior to my mentioning it here? Also nobody has posted to it in the last ten months except 3 posts from Blaze and I. We've asked instance admins to add this community - or some other one like it - to the sidebar of their instances but... crickets. (edit: though lemmy.cafe has it in their top banner, yay - that instance looks so damn welcoming and friendly!!😀
Sadly, what I conclude from this is that this is still an alpha-level "experiment" in social media. I thought that we were at least in beta but... if so, it is quite low-level. We seem stuck in this downwards spiral where the people aren't willing to put forth effort b/c the infrastructure isn't quite fully here yet. Perhaps Mbin, Piefed, or Sublinks will offer greater hope?
Quick start guide
Quick start guide Account You can use your account you created to log in to the server on which you created it. Not on other servers. Content is federated to other servers, users/accounts are not.support.lemmy.world
“So what, it’s the fediverse, you can use another instance.”
Dismissal of this type of criticism by just telling people to use another instance or saying "fediverse is decentralized" is unproductive, and honestly should be called out as harmful because it ignores the fact that instances when they become large enough and centralized enough, carry weight and can be extremely problematic like shown here.
A big part of dealing with these types of problems is to make people aware of them, another one is to deal with it at the instance level by defederating the problematic instances and cutting off the communities so that network effect doesn't continue to rear its ugly head. Just creating new communities isn't enough, if it was this wouldn't be the problem that it is.
When people tell others to stop complaining and dismiss the criticism because the fediverse is decentralized it seems like they either don't understand the issue, or they would just rather it not be addressed.
So while many people would prefer we just leave well enough alone, that's not condusive to these problems being dealt with, people need to talk about them, and action needs to be taken.
нравится это
classic нравится это.
ITT: genocide supporting fascists get triggered by being called genocide supporting fascists
We get it, you’re jealous about how leftists are always on the correct side of history.
Most of their comments are perfect examples. Everyone except them is a fascist liberal who loves genocide.
Even Uncommitted, who have basically the same opinion as everyone that Harris is in the wrong but Donald would be worse. Fascist genocide lovers.
b-b-bUt SuReLy rUsSiA hAs NeVeR dOnE a GeNoCidE?!
Or ChInA eItHeR?!
The USA supporting Israel is... ahem, never mind, anyway it's not anywhere on the same class as Russia CURRENTLY and ACTIVELY being the very ones DOING the genocide.
Nobody is that dumb. Therefore that's beyond ignorance - that's sheer, willful obstinacy.
нравится это
Druid_Moo нравится это.
Honestly I think the .ml folks have shown themselves to be such zealots that they should be considered a potential security threat to the broader fediverse.
The more places defederate from them, the more opportunity and initiative there will be for alternatives to their largest communities to grow.
Скрыто слово: nsfw
нравится это
classic нравится это.
Скрыто слово: nsfw
one with the highest number of users listed there with the exception of lemmynsfw.
Why? Just why?
This is the most hyperbolic take yet 😂 I can no longer sit back and allow Communist infiltration, Communist indoctrination, Communist subversion and the international Communist conspiracy to sap and impurify all of our precious fediverse memes.
Edit to add: oic, your alts keep getting banned
I’m not sure if there’s a solution here, but I’d like to urge people to avoid lemmy.ml hosted communities in favor of communities on more reasonable instances.
It depends on what exactly do you consider the problem to be, but my understanding is that solutions to the more general problem of "what server a community is in" are already in the works (multicommunities and stuff).
As for a more local kind of change... Be the change you want to see. Start up, and maintain, those alt communities that would serve as counterweights to the ones that are in .ml. Also, understand why they are in .ml in the first place yet still manage to function.
Had a special experience, too.
I got blocked for arguing. Other people who he posted burning Israel flags or wanted the total destruction of Israel had nothing to fear...
Black and white, you know... Maybe, there is a grey way between loving a country and its total destruction...
The "innovative" idea to destroy that country is probably 100 years old, has never been successful and is always a very good attempt to get as many people as possible killed over there... Maybe, if something fails every time over 100 years, it's time to try out something new. 😐
Genuine question: HOW though?!? I've user-blocked the entire instance, yet I see those comments basically everywhere I go, plus they used to not be able to reply to me and have a notification sent to me, but now on 0.19.5 that seems to have been un-done. In no way is a user-block like a personal defederation.
Also, fully 100% (not making this up) of everyone that I have told Lemmy about irl has said that this issue is why they refused to join the Fediverse. As the number of alt accounts goes up (some of them mine) yet the total number remains mostly constant, that spells doom for us eventually.
And it is not fair to the users of lemmy.ml either, for the rest of us to see the instance they come from and immediately brace ourselves for an onslaught - thereby potentially misinterpreting what they say, just b/c their fellows are so arrogant and insensitive and we have come to expect that from them.
The whole "just ignore the cancer and it will go away" approach leaves much to be desired, imho. Feel free to do as you please, but that's not what I am talking about: you asked, and as a result now you know some (certainly not all) of the reasons why others may not wish to do the same.
нравится это
Druid_Moo нравится это.
нравится это
sunzu2 нравится это.
There are about two people on here who wouldn't say "fuck Henry Kissinger".
What a massive load of shite. The fucking smell of boot polish off your breath is disgusting.
Jog on.
Lemmy.world is just the regime front on the fediverse.
News, politics subs, political memes are just place to talk about things the regime likes peasants to discuss. Trying saying vote for third party on there and watch that ban hammer lol
Regime whores for ya.
I'd say it's the love of social heirarchy but tomato tomatoes, as the red scare nonsense in this thread proves.
You've got morons babbling about .ml users being "security threats to the fediverse" LMAO, shitlibs will never change, and I say that as someone that got instance banned from .ml for saying federal representative democracies are, by definition, a form of democracy.
нравится это
sunzu2 нравится это.
One of the mods over there is a Russian who refuses to answer whether he's pro-Russian or not, says Russian propaganda doesn't exist, pretends to be American while intensely engaging in American threads, denies Uighur genocide, etc etc etc.
He has some older account where there was Russian being used but I think he may have deleted it or I just can't be arsed to look enough rn.
Anyway, one of the clearest pro-Russian trolls I've seen. Lemmy.ml is full of them, I don't know why lemmy.world federates with them.
Edit. Now he comments only when post is locked. Hey Davel, are you a pro-Russian troll? Reply to this and ignore the bit about being pro-Russian, won't you? ;>
Edit2 I came on PC to look up the link which he had forgotten in which he's posted using Russian/Ukrainian (I don't recognise which one), and the comments I've made about him have weirdly been removed. Something that would require a mod. But Pro-Russian Putler-dick loving trolls would never do something like remove comments that disagree with them while actively avoiding answering questions like "why do you support Putin?" "why are you pro-Russian?" You literally circle-jerk with Yogthos about how you're "definitely not a mouthpiece for Russian propaganda", while refusing to answer something as simple as "are you pro-Russian". It's **cringe. If you had grown up in the west, you'd actually know how ridiculous you sound. 😁
Because LW is just as bad.
.ml is run by angry tankie assholes.
LW is run by moral superiority assholes.
Assholes, assholes everywhere.
These are just my thoughts based on what I've read so far. Do what you will with it. This is just my general advice.
If you like a community on an instance, make friends on it. If you network with enough individuals that feel the same way about a community that you do, fork that community onto a new instance and carry on. I see others weighing in on too much control, not enough control, defederate, remove moderator or admin control from individuals that censor, ban, or lean one direction over another. You'll find these power dynamics are more prevalent or less prevalent depending on the instance you're on or communities your partipate in. If you feel strongly enough about it, be the change you want to see and determine what best course of action you should take that is within your power. Whatever you choose I hope you find or potentially create a community or instance that works best for you.
нравится это
Druid_Moo нравится это.
#ржд
Sensitive content
🔍 Описание
Фотография белого листа бумаги с черным текстом. На бумаге текст, написанный черным шрифтом, расположенный в центре листа. Текст разделен на несколько абзацев.
📝 Текст на картинке
В связи с предстоящим праздником «День Народного Единства» и переносом выходных дней установлен график движения э/поездов:
01 ноября - график четверга;
02 ноября - график пятницы;
03 ноября - график субботы;
04 ноября - график воскресенья.
Приведите к единой размерности: числа к числам, четверги к четвергам!
Хотя правильнее будет, пожалуй -
Развесуха
Я увидел развесуху
И почуял несвязуху:
Можно всё в одно ебло
Враз сменить на всех табло.
В заграницах-забуграх
Всё кругом уже в таблах.
А у нас всё также мухой
Резво скачет развесуха...
#ВижуРифму
тогда надо просто написать
ХУЙ ЕГО ЗНАЕТ КАК ОНИ ЕЗДЯТ
РЖД
Did you know Chevron caused a huge climate disaster through dumping waste into the Amazon river, which experts call “The Amazon Chernobyl”, and then locked up the lawyer trying to fight against it?
Chevron, who through a coup controlled the Ecuadorian government for many years, got the government to sign a law called “The Act of Liberation”, which, although very much contradicting the name, made it impossible for anyone (especially indigenous people) to sue the oil company.
They made it illegal to be sued.
(due to being rightfully questioned about my, and the video's, source on this, I've done some of my own source checking and found this exact court document, for anyone curious)
@dev_nadine This is the specific source the video used to cite the so-called “Act of Liberation”truthout.org/articles/ecuador-…
In the specific statement about the Act of Liberation it cites a now defunct webpage as a source.
The reason the webpage is defunct is not because the article is offline, but because the redirection to the article is offline. Using the Internet Archive I have found that it originally forwarded to this - still online - link:
therealnews.com/stories/empire…
This is simply a YouTube video embed inside of a webpage, which is a documentary named “The Empire Files: Chevron vs. the Amazon” which you can watch here:
youtu.be/MssnB31PmZINow, the documentary citing this somewhere in its 1.5 hour length is not good enough for me as a source, so I went looking with the keywords the “truthout.org” article used.
It is true that the work was finished by 1998 and the government signed an agreement discharging the company from any other liability, as supported by an article published in The Economist. However, tests undertaken by different parties and organizations, including Chevron’s own, proved that the “remediation” was a fraud
By seeingthewoods.org/2017/05/18/…The Economist article mentioned can be read for free using the Internet Archive:
web.archive.org/web/2020102303…
The work was done by 1998 and the government signed an agreement releasing Texaco from any further liability. Petroecuador was supposed to clean up the rest of the pits, but didn't do so, partly because it continues to use some of them (including Shushufindi 61).
One site specifically mentions the foreign ministry doing so, here it is simply referred to as “the government” and sadly no further citation given.In this New York Times Article from 2009 the claim is repeated:
nytimes.com/2009/09/24/busines…
Here it is seen as a statement by Chevron themselves.
This article links to the exact agreement, I think. Although I'm confused as to why it is in English:
theamazonpost.com/ecuador-gove…The exact PDF document representing the court file:
theamazonpost.com/wp-content/u…
(apparently it's in English and Spanish...)The exact agreement about liability in the agreement between Texaco and the Ecuadorian government
In accordance with that agreed in the Contract for Implementing of Environmental Remedial Work and Release from Obligations, Liability and Claims, specified above, the Government and PETROECUADOR proceed to release, absolve and discharge TEXPET, Texas Petroleum Company, Compañía Texaco de Petróleos del Ecuador, S.A., Texaco Inc. and all their respective agents, servants, employees, officers, attorneys, indemnitors, guarantors, heirs, administrators, executors, beneficiaries, successors, predecessors, principals and subsidiaries, forever, from any liability and claims by the Government of the Republic of Ecuador, PETROECUADOR and its Affiliates, for items related to the obligations assumed by TEXPET in the aforementioned Contract, which has been fully performed by TEXPET, within the framework of that agreed with the Government and PETROECUADOR; for which reasons the parties declare the Contract dated May 4, 1995, and all its supplementary documents, scope, acts, etc., fully performed and concluded.
I guess the important part is:the Government [...] proceed to release [...] Texaco Inc. and all their respective agents [...] forever, from any liability and claims by the Government of the Republic of Ecuador.
I hope this helps at first!Ecuador government signed off on Texaco cleanup in 1998 – The Amazon Post
Ecuador government signed off on Texaco cleanup in 1998mkgmarket (The Amazon Post)
@dev_nadine Not sure what you call recent! To be fair, the event is so recent, I'd call it “ongoing”. But it's been happening since the 2010s where the lawyer began representing the indigenous people.
The video I linked has a bunch of sources in the description! I highly recommend you look into that!
theguardian.com/commentisfree/…
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steven_D…
insideclimatenews.org/news/181…
Their Lives Were Ruined by Oil Pollution, and a Court Awarded Them $9.5 Billion. But Ecuadorians Have Yet to See a Penny From Chevron - Inside Climate News
Steven Donziger is back in his airy mid-century modern apartment on the Upper West Side of Manhattan, engaged over Zoom on a marketing call with a representative of the online publishing platform Substack.Katelyn Weisbrod (Inside Climate News)
@dev_nadine This is the specific source the video used to cite the so-called “Act of Liberation”
truthout.org/articles/ecuador-…
In the specific statement about the Act of Liberation it cites a now defunct webpage as a source.
The reason the webpage is defunct is not because the article is offline, but because the redirection to the article is offline. Using the Internet Archive I have found that it originally forwarded to this - still online - link:
therealnews.com/stories/empire…
This is simply a YouTube video embed inside of a webpage, which is a documentary named “The Empire Files: Chevron vs. the Amazon” which you can watch here:
youtu.be/MssnB31PmZI
Now, the documentary citing this somewhere in its 1.5 hour length is not good enough for me as a source, so I went looking with the keywords the “truthout.org” article used.
It is true that the work was finished by 1998 and the government signed an agreement discharging the company from any other liability, as supported by an article published in The Economist. However, tests undertaken by different parties and organizations, including Chevron’s own, proved that the “remediation” was a fraud
By seeingthewoods.org/2017/05/18/…
The Economist article mentioned can be read for free using the Internet Archive:
web.archive.org/web/2020102303…
The work was done by 1998 and the government signed an agreement releasing Texaco from any further liability. Petroecuador was supposed to clean up the rest of the pits, but didn't do so, partly because it continues to use some of them (including Shushufindi 61).
One site specifically mentions the foreign ministry doing so, here it is simply referred to as “the government” and sadly no further citation given.
In this New York Times Article from 2009 the claim is repeated:
nytimes.com/2009/09/24/busines…
Here it is seen as a statement by Chevron themselves.
This article links to the exact agreement, I think. Although I'm confused as to why it is in English:
theamazonpost.com/ecuador-gove…
The exact PDF document representing the court file:
theamazonpost.com/wp-content/u…
(apparently it's in English and Spanish...)
The exact agreement about liability in the agreement between Texaco and the Ecuadorian government
In accordance with that agreed in the Contract for Implementing of Environmental Remedial Work and Release from Obligations, Liability and Claims, specified above, the Government and PETROECUADOR proceed to release, absolve and discharge TEXPET, Texas Petroleum Company, Compañía Texaco de Petróleos del Ecuador, S.A., Texaco Inc. and all their respective agents, servants, employees, officers, attorneys, indemnitors, guarantors, heirs, administrators, executors, beneficiaries, successors, predecessors, principals and subsidiaries, forever, from any liability and claims by the Government of the Republic of Ecuador, PETROECUADOR and its Affiliates, for items related to the obligations assumed by TEXPET in the aforementioned Contract, which has been fully performed by TEXPET, within the framework of that agreed with the Government and PETROECUADOR; for which reasons the parties declare the Contract dated May 4, 1995, and all its supplementary documents, scope, acts, etc., fully performed and concluded.
I guess the important part is:
the Government [...] proceed to release [...] Texaco Inc. and all their respective agents [...] forever, from any liability and claims by the Government of the Republic of Ecuador.
I hope this helps at first!
Ecuador government signed off on Texaco cleanup in 1998 – The Amazon Post
Ecuador government signed off on Texaco cleanup in 1998mkgmarket (The Amazon Post)
Guten Morgen☕ ihr Lieben 😊 ich wünsche euch allen ein schönen Sonntag ☀️🍀
#gutenmorgen #kaffee #sonntag
#Eule #Verstecken #Natur #Wald #Tierwelt #Wildtiere #Vogel #Fotografie #goodmorning #coffee #sunday #owl #hiding #nature #forest #wildlife #wildlife #bird #photography
usr нравится это.
Sensitive content
🔍 Описание
Фотография товара. На фото изображен черный кулер для процессора. Кулер состоит из черного радиатора с вентилятором. На вентиляторе есть оранжевый логотип. Фотография сделана на белом фоне.
📝 Текст на картинке
Кулер для процессора be quiet! DARK ROCK 4
[BK021]основные - мед., 1400 об/мин, 21.4 дБ, 4 pin, 200 Вт подробнее
Сравнить ★★★★★ 1.4K 157
11 299 ₽
от 1 103 ₽/мес.
В наличии
в 1 магазине
Доставка на дом
завтра
Прекрасно справляется с R5-2600X. Камень в синтетическом тесте долбится "в отсечку" при температуре в помещении 28 градусов. t cpu остается 80 градусов.
Это очень горячий камень.
Короче. Эти куллеры стоия своих денег.
Еще очень хорош arctic freezer 34 duo.
dns-shop.ru/product/0a64fdd52f…Если бы покупал сейчас - взял бы именно его.
Что бы с тобой не произошло, сколько бы сказочных стран ты не спас, каких бы ты злодеев не победил, ты был ОБРЕЧЕН остаться в той реальности из которой ты пришел.
Dmitry нравится это.
@johan вообще! Я буквально вырос на его книгах, ходил в отряд по подобию его "Каравеллы" и понятное дело он был моим детским кумиром.
Но вот недавно я заполнял свой список прочтённого и читал пересказы его книг, чтобы вспомнить, что именно у него читал — и стало как-то не по себе...
Sensitive content
🔍 Описание
Это скриншот. На изображении показан список с двумя категориями: "Temperatures" и "Fans". Каждая категория содержит несколько пунктов, с возможностью выбора. Рядом с каждым пунктом отображаются значения: для "Temperatures" - градусы Цельсия, для "Fans" - обороты в минуту.
📝 Текст на картинке
Temperatures
System
CPU
Fans
CPU Fan
32,0 °C
36,0 °C
1880 RPM
36,0 °C
55,0 °C
2789 RPM
Почему проц вчера не заводился? Раскрой интригу )
Dmitry нравится это.
Write-as: Re-opening Free Accounts for WriteFreely
Re-opening Free Accounts
We’re re-opening completely free accounts on Write.as, so more people can start a blog on our clean, distraction-free writing platform. ...Write.as Blog
Why would I wrote a blog under these guys domain name? Remember medium, and how they locked every blog under a forced sign-in, so the content is no longer freely available on the web?
This seems like the same idea.
нравится это
Guadin нравится это.
That's the guy who developed writefreely.
Btw. I sometimes look at their development, I wait for a production ready docker compose setup. Using a config.ini instead of an .env file makes me sceptical.
config.ini
. But if you don't want to, my writefreely-docker has you covered. It has been used in production for a couple of hundred writefreely blogs over the past few years.
A free account is an easy way to test out the platform, give it a test ride, see if it works for you. If it does, you can pay for a Pro (or Team) subscription, and you get to use your own domain, and keep all the posts you already made on the free account, with all their comments and replies and whatnots.
Or, if it works out, and you want to self host, you can do that, too!
The difference between write.as and medium and other enshittified things, though, is that write.as is not VC funded, and Matt has no interest in making an "exit". Even if there are things I disagree on with him (eg, CLAs), I trust Matt to not enshittify write.as anytime soon. He's been running things for almost a decade now, remarkably well.
Sensitive content
🔍 Описание
Фотография. На изображении показан ночной город, снятый с высоты птичьего полета. В центре кадра - высокое здание с плоской крышей. На заднем плане видны силуэты других зданий, освещенных огнями. На переднем плане - густая зелень деревьев. Небо над городом окрашено в красновато-фиолетовые тона, что создает атмосферу заката.
📝 Текст на картинке
display: 59.992379 Hz
compensation: 60.0000 Hz
smooth motion off (settings)
01:01:11 full screen windowed (8 bit)
23.876 fps - 1972.8 bit/s - 4.20 (DVD/V13)
movie: 23.976 fps (says source file)
scale 0.1072/0.448 - 0.199/1920.943
touch window from inside
chrome - Bluedub 40
image: 186.67s frame 41.71ms
vsync: 60 Hz (best guess)
primary range 87.709 (best guess)
limited range 87.709 (best guess)
decoder queue 10/16
encoder queue 8/18
upload queue 8/8
render queue 8/8
dropped frames 52
delayed frames 0
present queue 1/8
average stat
presentation glitches 0
rendering 22.75ms
max stats (20)
present 1.54ms
rendering 0.00ms
present 1.54ms
STATO NOVA TECHNOLOGIE SE NAZYVA
Sensitive content
🔍 Описание
Скриншот веб-страницы. Изображение содержит стандартный белый фон с черным прямоугольником, занимающим большую часть пространства. В верхней части изображения, в левом углу, находится логотип YouTube с красным треугольником. В правом верхнем углу - строка поиска. В центре черного прямоугольника - текст белого цвета. Внизу - синяя кнопка.
📝 Текст на картинке
Sign in to confirm you're not a bot
This helps protect our community. Learn more
Sign in
Вот и посмотрим 😀 Вообще, фильтровал сквозь марлю. Но этого явно недостаточно.
Я сегодня попытался профильтровать через дрип-пакет. Нихрена в пакете не осталось. То есть, там нет взвеси. Это сам сидр такой мутный.
И памятуя о вчерашних опасениях - нет, донышко не выбило. Ни у меня, ни у жены.
Если говорить о приготовлении, то в рецепте было "месяц в темном помещении при комнатной температуре". Я так и делал.
Сейчас слитая часть хранится на улице, на веранде. То есть, при средней температуре как раз около +4.
Sensitive content
🔍 Описание
Это скриншот. Скриншот показывает список с двумя категориями: "Температуры" и "Вентиляторы". Каждая категория имеет подкатегории с соответствующими значениями. В правой части изображения расположены столбцы с данными.
📝 Текст на картинке
Temperatures
System
CPU
Fans
CPU Fan
1875 RPM
2909 RPM
Раскрой интригу, очевидно у тебя там что-то однопоточное, 32 бит...
KDE Goals AUA 20 Oct at 18:00 UTC.
floss.social/@kde/113284361449…
What would you ask our KDE goal champions?"Can I create a KDE app in [insert favorite programming language here]?", "Will you support my [insert exotic input device here]?", "Can I get a job as a KDE contributor?"...
Let us know in the comments what you want to ask our champions and we will make sure your question gets answered.
Join KDE's live-streamed AUA on Oct. 20 at 18:00 UTC:
tube.kockatoo.org/w/2tAyknEQc8…
KDE Goals Live TV
Watch live all the streams by the people working on KDE's Community Goals. Current Goals Streamlined Application Development Experience, We care about your Input, KDE Needs You, Upcoming events 20/...Kockatoo Tube
Sensitive content
Don't forget to join us this evening at 18:00 UTC!
tube.kockatoo.org/w/2tAyknEQc8…
KDE Goals Live TV
Watch live all the streams by the people working on KDE's Community Goals. Current Goals Streamlined Application Development Experience, We care about your Input, KDE Needs You, Upcoming events 20/...Kockatoo Tube
Snowman (@Snowman@pixelfed.social)
И последний на сегодня - "страшный и ужасный" Кай. Не, так-то он красавчик, обожает женщин и детей. А вот на мужчин проявляет агрессию. Выяснилось это когда его пристраивать начали. До того с ним всё барышни общались, и всё было замечательно.Pixelfed
@M1nxme Опасная женщина! Это так-то ведь не очень хорошо. Когда собака тебя МОЖЕТ защитить в случае чего - это здорово. Но если собака просто без повода на людей бросается... Я бы не хотел такую собаку.
Кай мужиков не то чтобы ненавидит, там предположили, что его неправильно с фигурантом на агрессию тренировали.
@M1nxme А, вон как. Ну это да, это запросто.
У меня у друзей дочка подобрала на улице собаку, которую порезали ножом, всю в кровище её домой притащила. Выходили. Так она да, никого кроме своих не признавала, сразу бросалась. Ну, то есть пыталась, Женька её всегда на поводке держал.
Злата, Златка. Только уж к старости смягчилась и я смог с ней подружиться. Как я радовался, когда она вместо оскала и рычания хвостом завиляла и гладиться подошла!
У нас самая маленькая была ирландский сеттер, потом был алабай и кавказец. Мы всех из спустя полгода у нас пристраивали в добрые руки. Пока все команды разучим, пока вообще в порядок приведем. Сложно было, потому что астма у папы бронхиальная была ): хз почему их выбрасывали, может не справлялись, собаки серьезные, их воспитывать надо.
@M1nxme С алабаем и кавказкой я общался. Собачки, конечно... Не дай бог им не понравиться.
Алабай, кстати, подошёл ко мне на улице и - брык на спину! Чешите. Почесал, погладил. Так он потом со мной какое-то время по городу гулял, как будто так и надо. Убегун, его знали. Ну, то есть это мне потом рассказали, что регулярно сбегает через забор и так гуляет.
Snowman (@Snowman@pixelfed.social)
С нашей сегодняшней прогулки с приютскими собаками. Это мой новый знакомый - Мартин. Пёс странной комплекции - крупный, но не широкий, а высокий. Поэтому напоминает велосипед. Но Мощи в нём! Таскал меня по лесу, у меня сейчас аж рука слегка ноет.Pixelfed
Пёс странной комплекции - крупный, но не широкий, а высокий. Поэтому напоминает велосипед.
Восхитительное описание 😀 А какой улыбчивый!
нравится это
Шуро и Wandering Thinker нравится это.
Sensitive content
🔍 Описание
Это скриншот. На изображении две зеленые стрелки, направленные вниз, и текст, который содержит цифры и буквы.
📝 Текст на картинке
9,9 MiB/s (61,4 MiB)
@lina Я тебе скажу, у меня с прошлым бепешником была такая ситуёвина, только питания не хватало жесткому диску. Вот там пиздец был, хотя венда отчаянно пыталась делать вид, что работает. Перекинул его на другую линию и все были довольны, пока он бп по моей глупости не бабахнул.
Но можно ли оправдать проблемами питания жесткий шейпинг на 1 мб/с? У меня сомнения, если честно.
This website uses cookies to recognize revisiting and logged in users. You accept the usage of these cookies by continue browsing this website.
BTC: bc1quk6a2p5g79kpec42fkyxv9ru5mhdpkpnf82s68
ETH: 0xD674ad9EF8059690E4a11d598c2B21bD7cF666C9
Monero: 49zfsrtHPrRCdcq8WedGirDRxE4KvSy7h2YdPEM2ctxQJKaGb77syxt2EZjjSy5b4TKDtTKksMdnjB88RjW2nGcsS3AJYth
Marco Di Fresco
в ответ на KDE • • •Any update on a new version of KMyMoney? It hasn't updated in a while.
While 5.1.3 still mostly works, I am looking forward to fix the blank homepage issue.