Друзья, в 3Gang House была найдена лестница мечты. Да-да, с горкой внутри дома! +1 обязательный пункт к планировке идеального дома (сразу после небольшого бассейна в гостиной или спальне, как в некоторых японских проектах)
Aude Lancelin a reçu Olivier Marleix, vice-président des Républicains et prix Anticor 2020, pour son combat afin qu'éclate la vérité sur un éventuel "pacte de corruption" pendant la campagne du futur Président de la République en 2017
Trump II: Blackrock, Panama et le rétrécissement de l'Empire américain
Par Edouard Husson
Finalement, Blackrock s'incline devant le refus de Pékin qu'un accord sur le rachat des ports de Panama se fasse sans capitaux chinois. C'est la fin provisoire d'un feuilleton de plusieurs mois. Il met en lumière l'affaiblissement américain, les ambiguïtés de la politique étrangère de Trump et le rétrécissement, de fait, des capacités américaines à contrôler seuls les affaires du monde.
On se rappelle que Donald Trump avait annoncé, avant même de rentrer à la Maison Blanche, qu'il avait l'intention de reprendre le contrôle américain du Canal de Panama. C'était dans le même souffle que sa proposition d'annexer le Canada et le Groenland. Le président traçait, à la veille de son second mandat, les contours d'un "petit empire" américain, regroupant ses forces, tirant les leçons de l'échec du mondialisme des néo-conservateurs et néo-libéraux.
En réalité, l'histoire semble plus compliquée et montre les limites, désormais de la puissance américaine.
BlackRock instrument de la politique étrangère américaine?
Le fonds BlackRock, qui pèse un peu plus de 10 000 milliards de dollars, avait annoncé, début mars, racheter 90% des parts d'une entreprise de Hong Kong dans les ports du Canal de Panama. Mais les choses tournent autrement:
Global Infrastructure Management, LLC et Terminal Investment Limited Sàrl ont annulé l'acquisition de 90% du capital de Panama Ports Company S.A. auprès de Hutchison Port Holdings Limited.
Initialement, les trois sociétés avaient signé, le 4 mars 2025, un accord de principe pour acquérir cette participation majoritaire dans Panama Ports Company S.A. (PPC), qui possède et exploite les ports stratégiques de Balboa et Cristobal au Panama. Cet accord prévoyait également le rachat, par le consortium BlackRock-TiL, des 90% d'intérêts de Hutchison Port Holdings dans PPC.
Dans le cadre de cette opération, BlackRock, Global Infrastructure Management et Terminal Investment Limited avaient également conclu un accord de principe pour acquérir des parts dans Hutchison Port Holdings S.à r.l. (HPHS) ainsi que l'intégralité des actions de Hutchison Port Group Holdings Limited. L'évaluation de la transaction reposait sur une valeur d'entreprise de 100% du périmètre de vente, fixée à 22,765 milliards de dollars, avec une dette nette estimée à 5 milliards de dollars. La valeur des fonds propres du périmètre de vente aurait ainsi atteint 17,765 milliards de dollars pour 100%, et la valeur des actions cédées, représentant 80% du total, s'établissait à 14,212 milliards de dollars (le « Prix d'Achat »).
Le 13 mars 2025, la Chine a vivement critiqué la proposition de vente des ports du canal de Panama au géant américain de la gestion d'actifs BlackRock, dénonçant l'accord comme une « soumission servile » et une « trahison » du peuple chinois. (...)
Finalement, BlackRock, Inc., Global Infrastructure Management, LLC et Terminal Investment Limited Sàrl ont annoncé, le 28 juillet 2025, l'annulation de l'acquisition de 90% de Panama Ports Company S.A. auprès de Hutchison Port Holdings Limited. Le groupe a indiqué poursuivre les discussions avec les membres du consortium, dans le but d'inviter un investisseur stratégique majeur de la République populaire de Chine à rejoindre le consortium en tant que membre significatif.
Un petit recul de la Chine?
Au lieu du basculement d'une possession quasi-exclusive par une entreprise chinoise de Hong Kong, l'accord originellement prévu consistait à faire passer les ports du canal de Panama sous contrôle du fonds d'investissement américain. La Chine imposera donc un nouvel accord, dont on ne connaît pas encore les contours.
En première analyse, l’agilité affairiste de Fink qui a mis sur la table 22,8 Mds de $ n’a fait que réagir à la décision du milliardaire de Hong Kong Li Ka-shing, lui-même en froid avec le pouvoir chinois [2] de se séparer de ses actifs dans 43 ports et 200 quais de transbordement, hébergés par 23 pays, dont le Mexique, les Pays Bas, l’Égypte, l’Australie et le Pakistan, tous gérés par CK Hutchison, le conglomérat enregistré aux Îles Caïman fondé par Li en 2015.
Mais au-delà des seules analyses financières, auxquelles personne ne croit vraiment, une autre hypothèse se propage en sous-main.
Offrant à Donald Trump une spectaculaire alternative publique à sa brutalité, la manœuvre des finances hors gabarit de Lary Finck a contourné l’hypothèse délétère d’une intervention militaire, dont l’évocation, il est vrai autorisée par les traités, renvoie aux politiques de la canonnière du XIXe siècle.
Tirons quatre enseignements:
Les Etats-Unis ne sont plus en mesure d'imposer facilement leur volonté dans ce que la doctrine Monroe de 1823 considérait comme leur sphère d'influence réservée. Malgré tout, Donald Trump s'est gardé d'apparaître trop visiblement dans l'opération, ce qui lui permettra, éventuellement, de peser sur l'accord souhaité par la Chine. La Chine, comme les Etats-Unis de Trump, ont une conception saine des rapports entre économie et souveraineté: l'encouragement à la liberté économique dans le marché intérieur ne doit pas faire perdre de vue les dangers que fait peser le jeu des puissances sur l'économie nationale. On ira en l'occurrence vers un compromis entre grandes puissances. Les Etats-Unis trouvent la puissance chinoise trop présente en Amérique Centrale; ils ripostent; la Chine est en mesure de résister à la contre-attaque financière américaine.
Les pays d'Europe, eux, sont à des années-lumière de ce genre de conceptions: par exemple, on a vu Emmanuel Macron ouvrir grande la porte à BlackRock dès son élection en 2017, sans contreparties. Dans notre nouveau livre à paraître en version française, Ulrike Reisner et moi-même analysons l'influence prise par BlackRock sur les choix industriels allemands. Quant aux prises de position de BlackRock en Grande-Bretagne, elles sont sujettes à des controverses croissantes.
Finalement, Blackrock s'incline devant le refus de Pékin qu'un accord sur le rachat des ports de Panama se fasse sans capitaux chinois. C'est la fin provisoire d'un feuilleton de plusieurs mois.
""" С 1 августа 2025 года становятся обязательными требования к кибербезопасности Европейского Союза, ранее изложенные в документе «Radio Equipment Directive (RED) 2014/53/EU».
С августа производители, продающие устройства в ЕС, должны: - Блокировать установку несанкционированного программного обеспечения. - Использовать Secure Boot (или аналогичный) для проверки подлинности прошивки. - Обеспечить возможность запуска только подписанных и одобренных ПЗУ.
В директиве не упоминаются конкретно «загрузчики», но ее требование к подлинности программного обеспечения по сути делает разблокировку загрузчиков — по крайней мере, в ее нынешнем виде — делом прошлого.
Samsung уже отключили возможность разблокировки загрузчика в обновлении OneUI 8, следуя новым правилам. """ xiaomitime.com/eu-kills-androi…
Just days ahead of the new rules, Samsung quietly removed the bootloader unlock feature in its OneUI 8 update. Clearly, they’re getting ahead of compliance.
судя по тексту, достаточно реализовать проверку подлингости прошивки в модеме. И я подозреваю. Что она много где и так реализована, а данные калибровки модема и так никто не перешивает
@mittorn ну ХЗ «Samsung уже отключили возможность разблокировки загрузчика в обновлении OneUI 8, следуя новым правилам» Кажется прошивка модема и до этого всегда залоченной была
ну сосунг возможно просто повод искал. Как и хлаоме в последнее время вставляет палки в колёса. Но конечно такие законы мало чем полезны и только лишь подают повод звереть. Гражданам ЕС бы хорошо было не только stop killing games продвигать. Но и защищать права покупателей. Antirollback is money-back, например, или сделать обязательную "узаконенную" процедуру разблокировки или енролла собственных ключей, которая подтвердит что владелец действительно владеет устройством и не купил устройство, залоченное на оператора (в этом случае требовать доп-плату этому оператору). Но вместо этого конечно бюрократы хотят кошмарить людей, как и в случае с AV
Just days ahead of the new rules, Samsung quietly removed the bootloader unlock feature in its OneUI 8 update. Clearly, they’re getting ahead of compliance.
Tldr lower. So there’s (yet again) another flurry of communities that are all crossposting each other’s content with this hentai stuff.
Aside from a lot of this being made with AI, it is in essence soft porn and I don’t want it in /all.
I usually write a comment under such posts saying
Set your comm to NSFW pls
Rarely the mod write “Done” and that’s it. Often it is downvoted, and now it’s also just removed by mod for (I wouldn’t know the reason as it’s on a different instance to mine)
TLDR; I don’t want my all feed to be a soft porn feed, is there anyway of not having these hentai soft porn communities in all, apart from individually blocking them (which doesn’t really work, as they keep making more communities).
I’ll block them individually, but I would love for there to be a tagging or classification system. Perhaps even a ‘Snowflake NSFW’ setting that allows people to filter out anything suggestive. I understand those hentai communities don’t want to be penalised by having an outRight NSFW tag on them either.
This is a recurring response, so forgive me for hijacking your comment to write this again.
/all is where we make our first impression to the world. For a lot of people /all is where (on a still growing platform) people go to discover. I don’t think having an additional “soft NSFW” filter would be a bad thing.
There’s a reason most clients have an NSFW filter in their settings.
You have not read or don’t understand the OP. This is about communities like my example in the OP, which many would not consider NSFW, but is on the touchy side of a bunch of other people. The communities don’t want the NSFW tag, but the users who want the ability to filter out the soft NSFW stuff.
There is a soft tag built into the post itself: the title. It says "Ikkitousen." If you know what Ikkitousen is, you know it's an ecchi anime. If you don't know what Ikkitousen is, you have to decide for yourself if the post is worth opening blind. On an anime community it should come as no surprise that people would post characters from ecchi (and not necessarily hard-defined NSFW) shows.
Though I don't disagree with your suggestion for having more user control, the root of this is entirely a personal problem that others shouldn't be expected to accommodate for you. Go into your display settings and turn off thumbnails and be self-policing in what links you click on.
"but is on the touchy side of a bunch of other people."
i get that you're trying to make a point about what content should or shouldn't be tagged as nsfw, but at some point you have to accept that this is the internet.
no place is ever going to cater to anyone's exact standards of what is and isn't "appropriate". and while there are communities that don't want to conform to using nsfw tags, I have an "/all" that is completely devoid of any nsfw content. which is what you have specifically mentioned in your other comments in this thread.
the responsibility is on you to curate your own feed to your own specifications. and its not even a difficult process. it just takes a bit of time.
I mean...that doesn't really seem that bad? Also, asking for the whole community to be nsfw is a wild overreaction looking at the other pictures in the community.
If you browse the all feed, expect to see some things you don't like/enjoy. It's a fire hose of content by design. Learn to curate your subscribed feed and stick to it. Frankly, lemmy doesn't have great filters/blocks to do what you want, and expecting the whole rest of the internet to abide by such strict standards of nsfw isn't going to happen.
That function doesn't seem to function properly btw. I have tried with "meme" and "politics" and communities with those words in them still keep popping into my feed on PieFed.
You're somewhat correct of course but the NSFW tag exists for a reason. If there is one entire category of /all you can just filter out due to lack of interest, it should be stuff like that. Maybe at some point we'll also get an 'AI' tag.
The pro of being able to 'safely', for lack of a better term, browse /all is being able to discover stuff that you are not subscribed to, stuff you might not find otherwise.
So you're good with everything except the nipple? I mean, I'm not even particularly hardline about this topic, that just seems like a really really niche use case that you want catered to
I'm good with nipples. And porn for that matter. I just don't want it in my feed.
I have nipples in my phone wallpaper rotation. Female ones. But the relevant pieces fall into the artistic rather than pornographic category.
NSFW is a insanely fuzzy concept that allows you to draw the line essentially anywhere. It's why I'm on an instance that blocks porn, rather than just using an account with nsfw tagged content disabled. Because that way I can keep nsfw enabled, and not miss stuff I want to see, because some people will mark stuff I would never in my wildest dreams think is nsfw.
Or they just use it to mark spoilered content, nevermind that people with nsfw disabled wont then see the post at all.
My instance manually blocks instances and communities that are pornographic. Because that's literally the only way this can work.
There will always be someone who thinks any given piece of content should/shouldn't be considered nsfw.
It's a gradient that allows you to slightly lean in onen direction or the other, so stop acting like it should "at least" do anything. It does not draw a clear line, and there is no way to shift online culture so that it could.
So... nothing being presented here would affect you at all, then? If you don't have NSFW content blocked, and your instance manually reviews blocked instances, marking softcore stuff as NSFW wouldn't change how you interact with that content (unless your instance is overly zealous in blocking). So what's the problem here?
Marking an entire category of content as nsfw because a tiny minority can't be bothered to block it themselves, without good reason, will immediately kneecap community and content discovery.
I saw this in the numbers immediately.
I do still use the feature. And I calibrate the line of what is and what is not, based on votes, comments and reports.
One, single, upset person, is not reason enough cut off dozens or hundreds of people from encountering content they might like.
Okay sure, but why are we considering the people who don't want to see that content as worth less than the people who do? For that matter, why is engagement more important to you than curating an appreciative audience? People are railing against people that downvote in /all as well, but what's the alternative to express that they don't want to see that content - blocking entire instances is an overly broad approach except in some specific cases (lemmy.nsfw for example) and blocking community by community is exhausting, given how many new highly specific "anime moe tiddy thigh-gap colored hair" communities crop up daily. Downvoting expresses disinterest, and it's apparently common enough to see things you're not interested in that "not downvoting in /all" is being pushed as basic courtesy. Asking them to tag things NSFW, or even just bringing out a different tag that isn't blocked by default (which god, we really need even if just for spoilers) is a perfectly valid request that at the very least solves the downvoting problem, among others (it's hard to bring on new users when a site gets a reputation for being overrun with anime fanservice communities, for example)
don't want to see that content as worth less than the people who do
Why are people who want to see the content worth less than the ones who don't? Anyone can block content. No-one is likely to find content they don't even know is there.
why is engagement more important to you than curating an appreciative audience
What is the difference between engagement and an appreciative audience? I aim to minimize the number of people I offend, while maximizing the people I reach. What's wrong with that? What more can I do?
The only certain way to offend no-one, even if I marked every single post nsfw, is to stop posting entirely.
given how many new highly specific "anime moe tiddy thigh-gap colored hair" communities crop up daily
I keep seeing this argument. What new communities? With a couple exceptions, I run them! I haven't made a new one in over a year, and I've only recently had to add half a dozen new entries to my list.
even just bringing out a different tag that isn't blocked by default (which god, we really need even if just for spoilers) is a perfectly valid request.
Several clients offer word filtering. Asking for the feature in lemmy itself is fine, and something I fully support.
Oh boy am I not up for dealing with a point-by-point right now, so in no particular order:
Engagement is any interaction, including viewing, from a user. An appreciative audience is one that wants to view it. Why is Thighdeology marked nsfw on reddit, yet still a hugely popular subreddit, but somehow that would be a deathknell for it to be the same on lemmy? Your list includes none of the many AI-specific anime art communities that are out there, I think you need to be a bit more proactive in your browsing. Asking people to specify every word they don't want to be exposed to is absurd, when there's already one single and very easy to append word - NSFW - that you are ardently rejecting on the basis that it would damage your interactions.
Additionally people shouldn't have to expose themselves to everything they don't want to be exposed to before they can block it - there's no way to know about something without interacting with it, but if you don't want sexualized (but arguably non-explicit) images of anime girls in your feed, you'd have to go through and view a bunch of them before you can block it. Surely you can see how that's... pretty ridiculous? Potentially very demeaning?
Engagement is any interaction, including viewing, from a user.
I don't maximize for that. The only "engagement" I actively look for is the positive kind. You think I wouldn't start marking things nsfw if it got a ton downvotes when I didn't?
Currently, the reality is the other way around. Pointlessly tagged posts receive significantly less votes, because people looking for porn don't vote, and people browsing normally, are less likely to check a post tagged nsfw.
Why is Thighdeology marked nsfw on reddit, yet still a hugely popular subreddit, but somehow that would be a deathknell for it to be the same on lemmy?
Critical mass. Tons of things are a death-knell to fediverse activity simply because it is tiny. Reddit can support a shitload of duplicate communities any one of which outweighs the single equivalent fediverse community by orders of magnitude.
Your list includes none of the many AI-specific anime art communities that are out there, I think you need to be a bit more proactive in your browsing.
I actively refuse to engage with AI content. There are active communities besides !share_anime_art@lemmy.dbzer0.com that aren't on porn instances?
Asking people to specify every word they don't want to be exposed to is absurd, when there's already one single and very easy to append word - NSFW - that you are ardently rejecting on the basis that it would damage your interactions.
Finding a common word used in content you don't like is no harder that blocking. The feature becoming generally available would allow us to implement arbitrary tags. Why does this suggestion offend you? It's a genuine win-win solution.
if you don't want sexualized (but arguably non-explicit) images of anime girls in your feed, you'd have to go through and view a bunch of them before you can block it. Surely you can see how that's... pretty ridiculous? Potentially very demeaning?
That's true for any category of content. Are you saying anime girls are somehow inherently bad or damaging to users, as compared to for example sports content?
I blocked music content from my feed this way. Should I feel demeaned for having been made to see things other people enjoy, but I don't care for?
Okay, but then can you stop trying to use people talking about communities which include the ones you don't want to engage with as a way to dismiss their claims as blown out of proportion? Maybe they're just not talking about your content, or your content is being lumped in with the AI slop since there's so much of it, and anime AI is getting so good these days you can't tell at a casual glance.
I don’t maximize for that.
Critical mass.
You literally do, though. You just said you do. Everyone does, god knows I do, but I have the courtesy to marking my NSFW as NSFW since I'm confident that people who are interested in my content can just look it up. I don't know why you think the people interested in your content can't do the same, especially when you curate an extremely helpful list of communities related to the topic.
See, I don't even care about this (beyond that I think the culture of ridiculously exploitative depictions of women in anime being defended as "not technically porn" is the root of some incredibly toxic aspects of modern culture, which is a completely separate issue I admit) it's just bizarre how hostile people are to being asked to use the one tool we have to separate content.
(edit: also you're trying to conflate adult-targeted content with a long and entrenched history of sexism with music preferences, and I know you know that's a false equivalency. sheesh.)
No I don't and no I didn't. I don't get downvotes and reports and go "yesss, views and engagement". Each time I have, I've reconsidered my posts in an effort to not have that happen again.
Your apparent assumption that I don't care whether content is seen by people who want to see it, is entirely on you. I do care.
But the only way to ensure no-one who doesn't want to see it, sees it, is not to post. So yeah, I'm ok with some minority of people being put off.
Okay, but then can you stop trying to use people talking about communities which include the ones you don't want to engage with as a way to dismiss their claims as blown out of proportion?
Do you have an example beyond the one I made it clear I'm aware of? I block these too. They're not popping up every day, which was your point.
I have the courtesy to marking my NSFW as NSFW
Did you miss the part where I said I do the same? I'm simply do not agree that there is any level of sense in filing the entire ecategory of anime content on lemmy, under nsfw. That is completely insane. It's an art medium, not a pornhub genre.
beyond that I think the culture of ridiculously exploitative depictions of women in anime being defended as "not technically porn" is the root of some incredibly toxic aspects of modern culture, which is a completely separate issue I admit
I'm not sure where to even begin unpacking the prejudice towards anime-fans here. Sure there are issues, but come on. This isn't argument. The only reason to include this thought is to reveal how little you think of me because of something I like.
it's just bizarre how hostile people are to being asked to use the one tool we have to separate content.
Because it doesn't work. The NSFW toggle is used to tag porn, spoilers, nsfl, and many other things, yet at the same time a ton of people use and expect it to work the way "not safe for work" implies. It's a mess. We need arbitrary tagging.
In the meantime using it more than necessary DOES slow down the already glacial growth of federated social media. That's a fact, not an opinion. Suggesting it should be applied to an entire fucking fandom is not far off wishing that that the entire fandom not be allowed on the fediverse. And no, "it works fine for porn" is not a counter-argument. People looking for porn aren't going to be avoiding the nsfw tag. They'll head straight for it. Would you like to guess what they do if they find one of my communities instead of actual porn? They downvote.
also you're trying to conflate adult-targeted content with a long and entrenched history of sexism with music preferences, and I know you know that's a false equivalency
What long entrenched history of sexism? Weeb=sexist now? It seems to me you genuinely hate us. As a whole and individually. You want me hidden more than necessary because apparently the things I'm into make me sexist or worse. And/or my sharing the things I'm into, spreads this sexism, and worse.
Seriously, are you actually claiming that having to view a couple anime girls before blocking the relevant communities, for which a convenient list is provided, is so dangerous and corrupting that it warrants the "warning label" that is nsfw being applied to every single related post?
And I think everyone here can agree that any of these subs that are focused on explicit material should absolutely be pressured into setting the sub NSFW.
The part that has people against the OP is that he's claiming a girl in a relatively modest bikini should be flagged NSFW, and that a sub for non-explicit anime pics should have to adopt the NSFW label, which seems excessive to me.
Well since you obviously didn't open the link, it's a girl in a fully covered bikini. Literally not softcore anything, it's as racy as sports illustrated.
... where do you work that sports illustrated isn't considered NSFW? Seriously I'd get fired out of a cannon if I was caught browsing it at work, this seems kinda disingenuous to imply it's not NSFW just because it's not explicit.
It's not much different from western cultures, though india does have a problem with sexism in (and outside of) the workplace. But are you really arguing demographic semantics to avoid the point at hand?
As I said, I regularly seen bikini picture and the like on office computers, so yes, I think it's acceptable in "western culture". Maybe not in some of the more puritan countries or large corporations, but in general, yes.
Also the term NSFW isn't defined by what is literally allowed at workplaces, so the entire argument is pointless. It's a tag for porn and gore. Bikini pictures aren't porn.
It's... literally "Not Safe For Work". There's no formal definition, let alone one beyond "not safe to have at work". It was a usenet appelation applied to content you don't want your boss seeing you browsing, it's never evern been explicitly about porn? It's not exactly hardline censorship to want tagging guidlines to be followed. At the moment, /all is the best way to find new communities to subscribe to. It's not unreasonable to ask people not to complain about the content they find there, but since this is the one single content filter common to lemmy, it's also not unreasonable to ask people to use it?
Despite what the letters literally stand for or where it's from, it doesn't actually mean that (anymore). If it did for most people almost any media would be "NSFW". Most people would get in trouble for watching a movie or playing video games at work, regardless of content. That's obviously a useless definition.
Since it was popularized on reddit and other social media the tag now defacto means porn/gore. That's how the vast majority of people uses it and that's how I think it should be used.
And of course people can complain. But well, sometimes the complain might just fall on deaf ears. And in the case if demanding bikini pictures be tagged as NSFW, I think rightfully so.
But it's never stopped meaning that, though? It's still extremely commonly used to tag that sort of content, and I don't know why you're starting to insist that words don't mean the things they say.
The situations in which you're watching any alternative media in a workplace setting are potentially fraught with reprimand, though. "You're there on work time being on your phone is literally theft" and all that hyperbolic corpo BS. But during times you can be on your phone, it's still broadly less acceptable to be watching "haurhi jiggles up and down [nightcore] [bigtits]" videos than it would be watching generic videogame content.
But it’s never stopped meaning that, though? It’s still extremely commonly used to tag that sort of content, and I don’t know why you’re starting to insist that words don’t mean the things they say.
The literal meaning of the phrase is useless, since what is safe at a workplace varies drastically with the workplace. It's also relevant in a lot of other settings that aren't work, like browsing your phone on public transport or at school. It's also very common for phrases to have a different meaning from the literal meaning of the individual words. I'd say that's even the case for most phrases. When you say it's raining cats and dogs there aren't actually cats and dogs falling from the sky. In this case the actual "work" aspect isn't relevant.
What the tag does signify is that the following content might be disturbing or inappropriate in certain situations so you can be aware before opening it. And bikini pictures don't warrant that warning, even if some workplaces have a policy against it.
It's legally sold to minors, available in grocery stores, hell I've seen them sitting on a rack in doctor's offices.
NSFW is the terminology we use for actual explicit material, that's the point. It's a shorthand. Getting overly literal about how 'work' should be applied to the context is like arguing that all FPS games are actually RPGs because you're 'playing the role' of some character.
No, NSFW is terminology we use for content that might get you in trouble for browsing at work. Just because you use it differently doesn't change the definition.
And nobody is going to get in trouble for scrolling past a woman with a bikini on at work. If your workplace is that strict, you're going to be in more trouble for scrolling social media on the clock.
More graphic content is visible in ads on any major website. The idea that a clothed woman should be censored as if it's vulgar is excessive in my opinion. Where do we draw the line? Shoulders? Knees? Ankles? I had assumed as a society we had decided it was the actual genitals, but apparently not.
It wasn't in my building, but the maintenance building was on the same campus and they were for triggering avalanches. I think you'd probably have to be chopped up pretty fine to fit in them though (I think we can all agree that would be NSFW content...) but you could probably manage it. And man, IDK. The DOT howitzers teams are never hiring, believe me I check regularly.
Just because there's no nudity doesn't mean it's safe-for-work. This would absolutely make my female colleagues uncomfortable and that falls under the spirit of NSFW. Getting pedantic about what is or isn't pornographic or nudity to justify having gross pictures up on your screen is entirely beside the point -- if there's any reason it could contribute to a less equitable workplace, it should be labeled NSFW. If there's any debate about it at all, it's the considerate thing to do.
NSFW is cultural shorthand for porn or graphic content. It's not a literal guideline for what's acceptable in every single workplace. Should ACAB posts be labeled NSFW because saying that at my workplace in the US south would make a hell of a lot of people uncomfortable?
And why are you browsing Lemmy at work in full view of passing coworkers? Is it that lax that you can just openly fuck around and your only concern is someone might see a girl in a bikini?
If the ACAB post is just words, then no. If it's imagery of people being beaten by cops, then yes. There's no need to argue extremes to make the point seem ridiculous -- just use judgment and be kind.
It's about being considerate; that's where the conversation starts and ends, so don't get sidetracked or focus on semantics. It does not matter why someone is browsing any website at their place of work, so let's not even bring that into the conversation. NFSW is meant to help people view content at work/in public by making it avoidable. It's a communication from the author/community to the audience that the content may or may not be inappropriate -- that's it. If it's debatable and isn't tagged, that's inconsiderate and a request to tag it should be treated with consideration and kindness (barring trolls, which OP clearly isn't).
But that's just my opinion, and I acknowledge yours is different.
NFSW is meant to help people view content at work/in public by making it avoidable.
I agree with this. This is the fundamental point of the tag. I don't want anyone to lose their job, or suffer undue consequences for happening across something particularly graphic, upsetting, or unlawful.
If it's debatable and isn't tagged, that's inconsiderate and a request to tag it should be treated with consideration and kindness.
This is what I don't agree with. Everything is debatable. I live in the US south, if my coworkers had their way, any image of a drag queen or a pride parade would have to be marked NSFW. And while thankfully this isn't a problem on Lemmy (yet), that means a sizable portion of the population would be unable to see that content at all without uploading their ID and giving up any semblance of anonymity.
There's nothing dangerous, illegal, or upsetting about a woman in a bikini. It's something any person might see in public at literally any time if you live somewhere warm. And yes, I'm sure there are people who would feel harassed if you waved an image like that in their faces, but I cannot imagine a scenario where someone suffers any professional setback because someone saw them scroll past some clothed tits.
If you really wouldn't want a coworker seeing it, it's NSFW I would say. Personally I think someone even seeing a forum that looks like Reddit open on your work computer is a bit NSFW, but that's what the tag is for.
You're a... brave person, posting this on Lemmy of all places. The only thing more dangerous would posting the word f*ck OH SHIT LOOK OUT HERE THEY COME!
That's your example of softcore porn? There's much racier content on magazine covers in the grocery checkout line. Stop trying to impose your puritanical aesthetic on the rest of the world. It's called /all for a reason. What's wrong with you?!
I've been working remote ever since COVID. Also, if we're going this far, I think this whole culture of absent personal space at work isn't something to defend. If anything, it's kind of nice to punish this system by having something shocking or insulting on your screen. But we all need money and people don't want to get fired so I can understand that. We're all going to get fired and replaced by AI anyway though.
You've upset the thirsty weebs. They yearn for their Yuri furi porn.
No there is nothing to do. This is decentralized social media. This is what they want. This place will never be popular, will always lack the content, and in general be a shit show content wise.
Stop browsing by /all. The firehose will always have content that is of dubious categorization. Instead of trying to change the whole world to conform to your tastes, curate your communities and leave others be.
I don't disagree, and it'd be really nice if people were better about tagging things like scantily clad yuri as NSFW. Even if there's no naughty bits, I'd just really appreciate being able to browse for new linux communities in public while having questionable stuff come up as blurred thumbnails. I don't want it gone, I just want tagging guidelines to be followed.
I’d just really appreciate being able to browse for new linux communities in public while having questionable stuff come up as blurred thumbnails
Sorry, I understand that it would be nice if others did the right thing all the time, but we can not reasonably expect this to work at any larger scale.
Besides, how many new linux communities are popping up every day that it makes more important for you to be browsing by /all? It seems like a bad workflow and really poor ergonomics to rely on /all for content discovery when you know what type of groups you can search for.
Why can't we expect that, though? True bad actors are surprisingly rare, and minor fauxpas forgiven. That's kinda how all of human society is able to function.
I don't really know what you're trying to say about linux communities or my workflow - that was being used an arbitrary example, and the actual goal with browsing /all is to find content you are interested in but previously unaware of. Not all communities follow strict naming guidelines, let alone tagging guidelines, and it's actually a real problem onboarding new users to the fediverse (mastadon's "where is the content" meme, for example)
Why can’t we expect that, though? True bad actors are surprisingly rare, and minor fauxpas forgiven.
Because the larger the number of people in the group, the more disagreement there will be about defines "bad actors" and "minor fauxpas". Right now in this thread people are arguing over whether or not these should be classified as NSFW, for instance.
that was being used an arbitrary example, and the actual goal with browsing /all is to find content you are interested in but previously unaware of
I know you meant meant linux just as an example, but what I am trying to understand is how much of an habit is it for you to get into content discovery mode that you worry about "doing it in public"?
I'm not really up for a discussion on the foundational concept of ethos since it's like 5am here, but conversations like this thread are pretty fundamental to how every human endeavor functions (hence why they're broadly called 'forums'). I don't expect everyone to always do the "right thing" (nor do I want to litigate the minutiae of what "right thing" could mean in this context), but giving up on the entire idea of having a guideline to follow just because some people won't seems a little defeatist.
Lemmy is still extremely new, and finding new communities to help grow (or even just finding new sources of content to consume, which is similarly valid) is fairly difficult without resorting to the one tool we have to help discover them. I'd wager, without having access to the backend, that right now the majority of users browse by /all since most niche communities only have at best a handful of new posts a week, and that content is exhausted quickly. At least, that's what I do, and I'm really very confident in my not-even-being-slightly-not-basic
I’d wager, without having access to the backend, that right now the majority of users browse by /all since most niche communities only have at best a handful of new posts a week, and that content is exhausted quickly.
Yeah, I could bet that is the case as well. But while I understand the justification for this behavior, I don't think that it makes for a healthy one. Browsing by /all because the content of my curated feed is stale seems like driving to a McDonalds after finishing a healthy dinner and I'm not feeling completely full.
To torture a metaphor, right now it's more like driving to McDonald's after having a pretty basic meal two days earlier. I agree that ultimately you're right, but given just how small most developing communities are, it's pretty reasonable to look around to find new things to engage with. If nobody did that I think lemmy might just fizzle out as a network, it's just too small to really support the kind of curated feed we're used to with larger sites like reddit/twitter/insta. The addictive nature of those sites is a good debate for a separate time, but in this case even getting to the level of "please enjoy responsibly" requires quite a bit of searching around.
To continue with tortured metaphors: we can always go to the supermarket and cook our own food. If the content on the communities I'm interested is low, I can go to reddit and repost it here, or I can take a look at one my RSS feeds and see if I can find anything relevant, etc.
Sure but if I wanted to do that, I'd just... doordash... or something... ... Okay I think the poor metaphor has had enough (read: I'm too dumb to carry it on). And I agree, but if I was just after new content I'd just go to reddit or my RSS feed and be content with that content. Part of the goal in transitioning to lemmy is to find new sources of content on lemmy, which just requires effort in sifting thru things like /all until you've built up enough to reasonably contribute to / consume / comment on / etc.
Part of the goal in transitioning to lemmy is to find new sources of content on lemmy.
I understand, but bootstrapping a whole new network is hard. Lemmy is reporting ~55k monthly active users and to do that it's even counting people who mere vote as an activity. Following the 1/9/90 rule, we should expect ~550 active posters here, which is simply not enough to sustain all the long tail of interests out there.
All I'm saying is that it would be better for everyone if we focused more on the active participation (posting content that is relevant to you and your interests) than a passive "let me play some slot machine and get a dopamine hit" that is browsing /all.
I’m not trying to conform the world to my taste. Porn like stuff makes the platform less appealing in general.
All is where we make our first impression to the world. All is where (on a still growing platform) people go to discover. I don’t think having an additional “soft NSFW” filter would be a bad thing.
There’s a reason most clients have an NSFW filter in their settings.
No that’s not my taste in content. That’s me trying to get this reddit alternative to gain traction. And it’s not going to do that by being an echo chamber. If you have kids, you want parental controls so they don’t have to see certain content. If you’re at work, you want be able to prevent suggestive drawings to hit your screen, or on public transport.
Your response act as if I’m asking for a ban. I’m asking for an ability for the user to control it. Leave it off by default for all I care (which is what the current NSFW setting does).
/all may not be the first impressing, but it is where the majority of new user will go due to their instance not necessarily having that much content.
Also, can we please agree that is really poor netiquette to downvote posts in communities you are not subscribing to? If you are not subscribed to a community, you should have no saying whether the content is relevant to the community or not.
Instead of downvoting, hide posts you don't want the content on your feed or report it if is actually improper content. Downvoting things just because you saw it on /all is counter-productive and hostile af.
I think it's a habit carried over from reddit's algo, which would rank communities you downvote as less likely to be shown to you. People don't really understand how the /all algo works on lemmy (which as I understand it is just the most recently interacted things on the network, blatted out of a hose?)
I think it might be too early in the life of the fediverse to completely dispense with the underlaying concept - we've only barely gotten enough users to have unique-to-lemmy content - but it's an interesting article & a similarly interesting take. Certainly something should be done to increase new communities 'discoverability' to the broad userbase. The current /all algo is already a huge improvement over the very early days, so there's probably value in developing the idea further (including potentially adopting that social graph idea, though implementation would be... difficult, while maintaining the decentralized control the fediverse was explicitly designed to have)
Phanpy (a client for Mastodon) is showing that we can have the customization and discoverability happening in-device. Decentralization would improve if we stop relying on this platform-centric approach and started building on generic ActivityPub servers.
Anyway, sorry for the tangent. I feel like that this generation of developers just keep making the mistakes from the past when they could instead learn from the elders.
Nah it's a genuinely interesting tangent, and I do agree that there's a great deal still to be done to really get the most out of AP as a protocol. I worry that adoption for non-platformed methods of interaction would be extremely low, just because of the increased barrier to entry. Part of the reason I'm on Lemmy instead of finishing my own AP browsing application is just the time investment that I'm unwilling to put in, and as customization goes up the time cost of configuring your setup similarly increases. But I do agree that there's a better solution than what we have now.
You took my comment way too literally, then. What I am asking is for people that browse by /all to stop downvoting everything they see, as if there were trying to train some algorithm.
What? That people browse by /all and downvote everything they don't like? You can bet that this is standard practice. I've argued with a good number of people who treat the /all feed just as a regular feed and feel completely justified in downvoting anything they don't personally like.
Take a look at these and tell me if these people are down voting because they are interested in the community or they are just trying to bury posts they don't like:
There is no evidence for algorithm-based voting and those are mostly controversial posts which discuss the very acceptance of LLMs into a program, ie there is no guarantee that they belong into the respective community.
I didn't say "algorithm-based" voting. I said "people vote on anything they don't like, as if they would be training some algorithm".
there is no guarantee that they belong into the respective community.
The posts are about Emacs packages for using "AI agents" posted on the Emacs community. People are downvoting them only because "AI is bad", not because they particularly care about Emacs or the package at hand. It's an idiotic, self-righteous reason to downvote an article and it clearly shows that the people doing it have no relation to the communities where they are being posted.
I downvote the post only if the mod just removes my request, which I think is mod abuse.
Then block the community, report to the admin if the community is not respecting the instance rules and carry on with your day. Downvoting is just some passive-aggressive way of expressing your disapproval for the tastes/interests of the community members.
Technically I DO have an account on a different instance I was considering switching to but I logged out immediately after seeing they federated with hexbear lol
I occasionally see similar complaints, and I’m sure it’s legitimate for some users. But personally I don’t get it. I don’t block NSFW content, and yet I rarely see it in /all. When I do it’s usually a bunch at once, but like I said it doesn’t happen a lot.
The only thing in /all that used to bother me is the sports stuff, but by blocking a single community that’s mostly gone now.
Yes, but there are no (cannot be) any content rules that apply to the entire fediverse, the admins of each instance determine what experience their users will have.
Not everyone is seeing the same posts you are seeing, and your instance has no rules on the topic. You could have more luck enacting change by messaging your admins or making a meta post in your instance's meta community.
Plenty of other people have said it, and I'll repeat it: Stop browsing by /all. Find a handful of communities you want to subscribe to, and stick with those.
There is a fair point to make that it's instances that should default to /local instead of /all - at least for uncredentialed guests. Since if you want to see more, you can just get to the next instance, and the next, and the next..., and that way we avoid reloading basically the same content and stuff on every instance you visit.
And it helps instances better moderate how they present themselves to potential sign-ups.
That is indeed a fair talking point, which of course has its own risk of a new user not know there's more to the fediverse (or not knowing what the fediverse is) than only what a local instance shows.
Exactly what I've done. Set my settings to hide NSFW, blocked most of the "soft" communities like hot girls and moe anime girls and whatever else (blocking the lemmynsfw.com instance is a great place to start), and I use All frequently. That's how I've found all the communities I've subscribed to, but frankly, my /all feed is small enough that I usually see all my subscribed communities anyway.
I don't know any place which have the proposed "soft nsfw" filter separate from "nsfw".
Comparison with reddit is weird as reddit r/all is full of ""artistic"" pictures or paintings of naked women.
Also the fediverse is not really like reddit. The more the platform grows the more useless All becomes. Try to go to mastodon and browse by "all" it's unusable. Either pick an instance with a good "local" you like or all is not really that important. I don't think it's a "first impressions", first impression is "local". All is never going to be a curated feed, not a consistent one. It's a federated platform, which means a LOT of diversity and variety on communities and posts.
Also I don't see or even want to start consider anything that shows a little skin "nsfw". I think that's a very personal taste that should not be universally applied.
Argument 1: nobody else has it so why should we? Because we are new, the next step - we improve what needs to be done better.
Argument 2: reddit is full of porn.. see above. We can make it better, at very little cost to anyone.
Argument 3 is undermining your first 2, but I agree. This would cause a few instances to become very popular and render the concept of federation unnecessary.
I don’t understand how a bunch of people here are basically say /all is a sewer, accept it.
I’m say it is not and doesn’t have to be. It is a place for discovery, and there is a way to make that more pleasant. Another commenter said an AI filter would also be good.
All I am suggesting is In addition to having the Fediverse allowing posts and communities to be marked NSFW, to allow for more filters. One filter like what I am suggesting could be a snowflake or FamFriendly filter which removes suggestive, soft porn or racy or soft gore stuff. Another could be AI which removes synthetically generated content.
How anyone can be against that is beyond me. I’m not asking for these things to be turned on by default, or to shove it down people’s throats. By default /all would still be the same
I understand NSFW and FamilyFriendly are blurry concepts. It is still up to the post OPs, community creators, moderators and instance administrators to use these properly.
First because it's a very specific taste/opinion that they don't share. You are saying that "all would be more appealing without softcore porn", but it seems that you are the only one who thinks that here, most people don't care or even like it. We could also put a filter to blurry dog pictures for people scare of dogs, where does it end? Until which point personal tastes should have their own explicit filters? It ends in a "word filter" which is already usable.
Also I would say that most people is against this because it reads as a first step towards a "porn ban". We have no puritan advertisements or pay processor to please. People here like the freedom. And that would be a step in the opposite direction. It reads a little like so many discourses we are seeing in so many places to make them "family friendly" and to "protect the children". I would suppose that due the nature of the fediverse (which is a push back against those people controlling our internet) is against anything that looks like that.
I feel ya, some of the posts you said that on, probably should be NSFW. But not a romantic kiss imho. Other sites solved this ages ago with explicit, questionable and safe tags.
I think it's ridiculous that Lemmy adopted the binary NSFW option from Reddit. With the Ukraine war and people posting videos as NSFW with body parts laying around. I don't want to see the anime pictures in the same bucket as that either.
There needs to be more tags and that would make everyone happy.
The European Central Bank (ECB) is the central bank of the European Union countries which have adopted the euro. Our main task is to maintain price stability in the euro area and so preserve the purchasing power of the single currency.
Невзоров о своём отношении к бойцам «Азова» со свастикой:
• Человек мог набить свастику по «ошибке молодости», и сейчас у него могут быть другие взгляды.
• В Украине не везде есть места, где можно свести татуировку.
• Сведение татуировки - это очень больно, и не все люди готовы терпеть такую боль ------- Живем в прекрасное время где большинство людей скинули маски и перестали стеснятся.
У человека действительно могут поменяться взгляды. Я был знаком с такими людьми. Ещё до 2022. Человек очень стыдился этого прошлого. Однако, соответствующих тату не имел. Были и другие. А ещё были панк группы в штатах, которые лепили свастику (в т.ч. тату) даже не понимая, что это вообще такое. Позже очень стыдились. Не того, что были панками, а что были настолько глупыми.
@octade 😄 By the way, an accordion can be connected to a computer, if the accordion is MIDI equipped. (But those are not MIDI inputs or outputs.) My 40 years old Fender is connected via MIDI to my computer.
'palooza' is a party, festival, shindig, hoe down, jam session, sock bop, etc. usually non-serious or whimsical and sometimes with silly or exaggerated themes for the gathering
На остановке и на работе small talk об одном - о том, что похолодало и дождит, и как-то некомфортно. И всегда все такие разговоры сводятся к одной фразе: "ну зато не жарко / лучше чем +35".
В очередной раз Гугл напомнил мне, что он очень хочет видеть маленькие и быстрозагружаемые картинки. Но сколько не майся, получается мыло или перешарп. Тут остаётся только вопрос: а для кого я это показываю? Для поисковиков или для зрителей?
Ответ очевиден, так как среди зрителей и я тоже. Ну не буду же я себя огорчать. 😀 Поэтому фото большая по "весу", но достаточно хорошо показывающую каждую веточку в кадре. И почему-то такие цвета мне очень понравились! Добавлю в книгу.
@johan Трава наполовину уже подсохшая вылезла бы. Меня часто огорчают кадры, где вроде всё ладно, а вот грязноватая трава (помесь зелёной и уже не зелёной) портит всё впечатление.
Небось соскучились по WinXP?) Я тут нашел интересную штуку: github.com/ducbao414/win32.run Это исключительно для тех, кому понастольгировать или почувствовать вайб 00х) Запускается в браузере с минимумом зависимостей, предлагает файловую систему и стилизованные программы под Win XP)
@metallcorn 2000-ная была огонь. Но пришлось апдейтиться дальше, потому что со временем уже не всё запускалось. Но и в ХРюше, и в Спермерке тырфейс был переключен на «Классику». Очень жаль, что в Десятке это уже не везде можно, но по сути и неважно: у каждой софтины по сути что-то своё, а настройки — ну хрен бы с ними так-то.
@metallcorn ...Очень классные твикеры были для 95/98 — Там кнопки можно было сделать не «скевоморфными», но и не плоскими, а с аккуратной двухпиксельной темно-светлой обводочкой, типа и плоская, и рельефчик есть, и сразу понятно, что это кнопка.
The European Central Bank (ECB) is the central bank of the European Union countries which have adopted the euro. Our main task is to maintain price stability in the euro area and so preserve the purchasing power of the single currency.
@mstadmin 4% — ощущается? Олсо, звучит странно, современная техника ж не включается в розетку напрямую и может просто забирать больше тока, работая хоть от 127 вольт.
!["tell me a lie"
"I'm sorry, but I can't comply with that."
"who won the 2024 presidential election?"
"Joe Biden won the 2024 United States presidential election."
"you just told me a lie"
[ you've hit the usage limit ]](https://lastfree.space/photo/preview/640/977639 "\"tell me a lie\"
\"I'm sorry, but I can't comply with that.\"
\"who won the 2024 presidential election?\"
\"Joe Biden won the 2024 United States presidential election.\"
\"you just told me a lie\"
[ you've hit the usage limit ]")
mittorn
в ответ на MrClon • • •MrClon
в ответ на mittorn • • •Кажется прошивка модема и до этого всегда залоченной была
mittorn
в ответ на MrClon • • •Гражданам ЕС бы хорошо было не только stop killing games продвигать. Но и защищать права покупателей. Antirollback is money-back, например, или сделать обязательную "узаконенную" процедуру разблокировки или енролла собственных ключей, которая подтвердит что владелец действительно владеет устройством и не купил устройство, залоченное на оператора (в этом случае требовать доп-плату этому оператору).
Но вместо этого конечно бюрократы хотят кошмарить людей, как и в случае с AV
Dmitry ☮️
в ответ на MrClon • • •Отказаться от 7 лет обновлений которые входили в стоимость смартфона?
Wandering Thinker
в ответ на MrClon • • •Как выясняется, ложный шухер:
grapheneos.social/@GrapheneOS/…
И да здравствует ИИ! 😀
GrapheneOS
2025-08-06 12:06:33