ZSF CHARTER III: POST-SOVEREIGN SAFETY, CRISIS RESILIENCY, AND COMMUNAL WELLBEING
Zero-State Federalism (ZSF) – FOUNDATIONAL FRAMEWORK FOR A DECENTRALIZED CIVIC-INFRASTRUCTURAL PROTOCOL

TITLE I: PREAMBLE

In recognition of the inherent fragility of human societies under coercive systems and in alignment with the principles of Zero-State Federalism (ZSF), this Third Charter establishes the constitutional architecture for post-statist safety, crisis resilience, and civilian well-being. This charter abolishes all forms of institutionalized violence, replaces punitive justice with restorative protocols, and ensures unconditional access to health, security, and dignified participation in all conditions-including collapse.

TITLE II: PRINCIPLES OF POST-CARCERAL SAFETY

Article 1: Rejection of Coercive Enforcement

No sovereign or militarized authority shall exist under ZSF. All safety protocols operate under the principles of:

Non-coercion – No individual or entity may enforce compliance through violence, imprisonment, or deprivation.

Revocable legitimacy – All safety-related roles are temporary, algorithmically audited, and subject to immediate revocation via civic consensus.

Mutual aid first response – All harm reduction is handled by civilian-led Mutual Aid First Responder (MAFR) units.

Article 2: Elimination of Punitive Justice

Prisons, police forces, and punitive sentencing are abolished. In their place, ZSF enforces:

1. Restorative Civic Mediation – Conflicts are resolved through facilitated dialogue between affected parties.
2. Algorithmic Harm Assessment – Automated systems categorize harm severity (physical, psychological, infrastructural) to determine appropriate restorative measures.
3. Non-Incarcerative Reintegration – Individuals who commit harm undergo voluntary re-education and community service under public oversight.

Article 3: Harm Reduction Over Punishment

All safety protocols prioritize:

Prevention via algorithmic early warning systems (e.g., domestic violence risk detection, mental health crisis prediction).

Immediate de-escalation by trained MAFR units (no armed responses permitted).

Restorative reintegration – Those who cause harm are assigned to non-coercive labor roles (food production, repair work) to rebuild trust.

TITLE III: COMMUNAL SAFETY & DECENTRALIZED HARM RESPONSE

Article 4: Mutual Aid First Responder (MAFR) Units

Each district shall maintain MAFR units composed of:

Crisis mediators – Trained in conflict de-escalation and restorative justice.

Medical responders – Providing immediate care without coercion or conditionality.

Structural repair teams – Addressing environmental hazards, infrastructure damage, and supply-chain disruptions.

All MAFR personnel rotate every 3 months to prevent consolidation of authority.

Article 5: Federated Militia Coordination

To ensure safety in collapse scenarios:

Non-lethal defense networks shall operate under strict rules of engagement.

Decentralized command structures prevent any single entity from monopolizing force.

Civic oversight requires all militia actions to be livestreamed and subject to immediate revocation via CSRO (Council Support Revocation Order).

Article 6: Automated Threat Detection & Early Intervention

AI-driven surveillance systems shall monitor:

Ecological hazards (pollution, resource depletion, climate disasters).

Human-made threats (violence, sabotage, supply-chain disruptions).

Mental health crises via algorithmic behavioral analysis.

All alerts trigger MAFR response teams before escalation occurs.

TITLE IV: CRISIS RESILIENCY & POST-COLLAPSE PROVISIONING

Article 7: Food, Water, and Shelter Guarantees

Under Article 3 of the ZSF Central Charter, all civilians are entitled to unconditional access to:

Tier-0 SAPs (food, shelter, medical care, energy).

Decentralized supply networks with automated redistribution protocols.

Local contingency stocks maintained by district-level cooperatives.

Article 8: Medical Care as a Non-Negotiable Right

No person shall be denied healthcare under any condition. ZSF enforces:

Algorithmic triage systems to ensure equitable distribution of resources.

Decentralized medical co-ops with no monopoly on knowledge or treatment.

Public health livestreaming – All major health decisions are reviewed by algorithmic and civic oversight.

Article 9: Mental Health Support Networks

To counter psychological harm in collapse scenarios:

Voluntary crisis counseling via encrypted channels.

Algorithmic mental health monitoring (with opt-out options).

Community-led support circles for trauma recovery.

TITLE V: RESTORATIVE JUSTICE & CONFLICT RESOLUTION

Article 10: Harm Assessment & Restorative Protocols

All conflicts undergo automated harm assessment:

1. Severity categorization (low, medium, high).
2. Affected party consultation – Victims determine appropriate restorative measures.
3. Algorithmic recommendation for mediation or community service.

Article 11: Non-Incarcerative Reintegration

Those who commit harm:

Undergo voluntary labor reeducation (food production, repair work).

Are subject to temporary SAP adjustments (reduced leisure allocation).

May petition for reinstatement via public review after rehabilitation.

Article 12: Elimination of Retributive Sentencing

No person shall be imprisoned or deprived of SAP access as punishment. Instead:

Mandatory mediation sessions.

Community service assignments.

Algorithmic behavior tracking (with opt-out).

TITLE VI: ALGORITHMIC TRANSPARENCY IN SAFETY SYSTEMS

Article 13: Livestreamed Harm Response & Militia Action

All safety-related decisions must be:

Fully recorded and archived.

Subject to civic review via livestreams.

Revocable via CSRO or emergency referendums.

Article 14: Public Oversight of AI-Driven Threat Assessment

Algorithmic surveillance systems shall:

Operate with full transparency (no black-box functions).

Allow for civic audits to prevent bias or misuse.

Be subject to immediate deactivation via SAP-backed referendums.

TITLE VII: CIVILIAN WELLBEING & SOCIAL SUPPORT

Article 15: Unconditional Access to Mobility, Communication, and Energy

No person shall be denied:

Transportation (local transit systems, repair services).

Internet access (encrypted communication networks).

Energy provisioning (decentralized solar/wind grids).

Article 16: Elimination of Surveillance & Reputational Harm

ZSF prohibits:

Data harvesting for behavioral control.

Public shaming or stigmatization of past actions.

Algorithmic profiling based on performance metrics.

TITLE VIII: FINAL CLAUSES

Article 17: Principle of Reciprocated Liberty

All rights under ZSF are tied to mutual responsibility, not production. Participation is voluntary; survival is unconditional.

Article 18: Adaptive Federation & Collapse Resiliency

ZSF communes shall maintain:

Horizontal federation across bioregions.

Decentralized data silos for post-collapse governance.

Manual consensus fallback mechanisms.

CONCLUSION

This Third Charter of Zero-State Federalism (ZSF) establishes the constitutional framework for a society free from coercion, punishment, and institutionalized violence. By replacing punitive justice with restorative protocols, ensuring unconditional access to life necessities, and maintaining decentralized safety networks, ZSF guarantees communal well-being under all conditions-including collapse.

No states.
No classes.
No permanence.

Only encrypted coordination and mutual provisioning.

ZSF CHARTER III AMENDMENTS

AMENDMENT I: ARTICLE 6 – AUTOMATED THREAT DETECTION (HUMAN OVERRIDE CLAUSE)

Amendment: The Article shall be amended as follows:

Article 6(1): Human Oversight in Automated Threat Detection
All algorithmic threat detection systems shall include a human override mechanism to prevent false positives, bias, or unintended escalation. Final intervention decisions must be verified by a MAFR-human review team before deployment.

Procedure:

If an automated alert is issued, it triggers an immediate MAFR response.

A designated Human Verification Unit (HVU) shall assess the situation within 15 minutes.

The HVU may override, adjust, or confirm the algorithmic recommendation based on real-time conditions.

All overrides must be recorded and subject to public review.

AMENDMENT II: ARTICLE 12 – ALGORITHMIC BEHAVIOR TRACKING (VOLUNTARY OPT-OUT WITH NO PENALTY)

Amendment: The Article shall be amended as follows:

Article 12(2): Voluntary Opt-Out Without Penalty
All individuals have the right to opt out of algorithmic behavior tracking at any time, with no loss of SAPs or reduction in provisioning access.

Clarification:

The opt-out mechanism shall be instantaneous and irreversible.

No person may suffer reputational harm, reduced civic standing, or diminished access due to exercising this right.

Alternative dispute resolution methods (restorative mediation, community reports) must remain available for those who opt out.

AMENDMENT III: ARTICLE 5 – FEDERATED MILITIA COORDINATION (MOBILIZATION THRESHOLDS)

Amendment: The Article shall be amended as follows:

Article 5(3): Militia Mobilization via CAP-Mediated Consensus
Militia deployment shall require strict decentralized approval thresholds, enforced through the following mechanisms:

1. Initial Threat Detection:

An algorithmic alert triggers an automated civic notification system.

Affected districts receive a 24-hour window for discussion.

1. CAP-Mediated Vote:

If consensus is insufficient, a triple-signature quorum must be activated:

One signature from a randomly selected PACM.

One signature from a Federated Council delegate.

One signature from an algorithmic equity observer.

1. CSRO Override (Emergency Conditions Only):

If immediate action is required, the Council Support Revocation Order (CSRO) system may authorize deployment via:

A 65% PACM majority vote.

A 24-hour CAP livestream announcement.

An emergency civic poll exceeding 55% threshold.

All militia actions must be livestreamed and subject to immediate revocation if consensus is broken.

AMENDMENT IV: ARTICLE 13 – LIVESTREAMED HARM RESPONSE (DATA RETENTION & IDENTITY OBFUSCATION)

Amendment: The Article shall be amended as follows:

Article 13(2): Civic Data Retention Limits & Identity Protection
To prevent livestream archives from becoming a reputational harm vector (in violation of Article 16), the following measures must be enforced:

Automated facial/voice anonymization in all public recordings.

30-day data retention limit for non-critical incidents.

Manual deletion requests via SAP-backed civic interface.

Exceptions:

High-severity incidents requiring historical review may be retained indefinitely but obfuscated by default.

AMENDMENT V: ARTICLE 9 – MENTAL HEALTH MONITORING (MANUAL OPT-OUT ALTERNATIVES)

Amendment: The Article shall be amended as follows:

Article 9(3): Manual Alternative to AI Monitoring
All individuals shall have the option to opt out of algorithmic mental health tracking and instead engage with:

1. In-Person Consultation:

Volunteer mental health workers (trained by district co-ops).

1. Community Report Structures:

Confidential peer-based support networks.

1. Cryptographic Anonymity Channels:

Encrypted helplines with no identity tracing.

Clarification:

No person shall suffer reduced access, reputational harm, or SAP penalties for opting out of AI monitoring.

All manual alternatives must be fully resourced and non-coercive.

CONCLUSION

These amendments reinforce ZSF’s commitment to non-coercion, revocable legitimacy, and decentralized safety systems. By clarifying human oversight mechanisms, strict militia deployment thresholds, and voluntary participation in monitoring systems, this charter ensures that no person is subjected to institutionalized violence, surveillance, or reputational harm under Zero-State Federalism.

No states.
No classes.
No permanence.

Only encrypted coordination and mutual provisioning.

ZSF CHARTER II: ALGORITHMIC ARCHITECTURE, SYSTEMIC ENHANCEMENTS, AND POST-SOVEREIGN GOVERNANCE

TITLE I: ALGORITHMIC COORDINATION PROTOCOL (ACP)

Article 1: Foundational Principles of Algorithmic Sovereignty
The ACP is the cryptographic backbone of Zero-State Federalism, ensuring all provisioning and governance functions are non-coercive, transparent, and horizontally distributed. No human actor may possess singular authority over core algorithmic processes.

Article 2: Non-Sentient Autonomy
All algorithms governing SAPs, CAPs, project allocation, and trade protocols shall operate independently of human oversight. Their logic must be livestreamed to the public in real-time with no black-box functions.

Article 3: Decentralized Algorithmic Authority
No single server cluster or data center may host more than 15% of core algorithmic functions. Geographic redundancy is mandatory, and all nodes must undergo federated consensus checks every 24 hours.

TITLE II: SOCIAL ALLOCATION POINT (SAP) SYSTEM ENHANCEMENTS

Article 4: Dynamic SAP Weighting
To ensure equitable provisioning regardless of individual circumstances, SAPs shall be dynamically weighted based on real-time data such as:

Geographic scarcity indexes

Environmental stress indicators

Communal priority shifts

A central algorithm shall recalibrate weightings bi-weekly to prevent bottlenecks or surpluses.

Article 5: Tiered SAP Allocation
SAP issuance must now reflect three tiers of provisioning, with automatic redistribution protocols:

1. Tier-0 (Unconditional Survival Access)

Food/Water

Shelter

Medical care

Energy

Mobility

1. Tier-1 (Communal Infrastructure Maintenance)

Water purification

Waste management

Emergency response

Data networks

1. Tier-2 (Elective Participation & Creative Projects)

Art and culture

Education

Research and development

Article 6: SAP Rebalancing via Negative Feedback Loops
If a project or service category receives excess SAPs, the system must auto-adjust by:

1. Reducing its visibility in user interfaces.
2. Redirecting surplus allocations to underfunded Tier-0 provisioning.
3. Issuing public notifications detailing reallocation logic.

TITLE III: CANDIDATE ALLOCATION POINT (CAP) SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS

Article 7: Anti-Monopoly CAP Distribution
To prevent consolidation of power among high-visibility candidates, the following measures shall be enforced:

No individual may receive more than 30% of district-wide CAP support in a single election cycle.

If a candidate exceeds this threshold, their surplus CAPs are redistributed to lower-ranked contenders.

Article 8: Live-Algorithm Candidate Vetting
Before elections, all candidates must undergo automated vetting for:

Historical breaches of ASP (Anti-Stratification Principle)

Inconsistent project alignment

Failure to complete prior commitments

Candidates deemed unsuitable by the algorithm shall be ineligible until a federated equity review is conducted.

TITLE IV: POST-COLLAPSE RESILIENCY PROTOCOLS

Article 9: Federated Data Silo Systems
In anticipation of digital collapse, ZSF shall maintain parallel analog and cryptographic data silos in every district. These shall be updated quarterly via decentralized audit teams.

Article 10: Manual Consensus Fallback Mechanisms
Should the algorithmic core fail, provisioning decisions shall revert to:

District-level consensus assemblies

Blockchain-backed SAP/CAP records

Randomly selected PACMs (rotational leadership)

All decisions must be livestreamed and archived for post-collapse verification.

TITLE V: MILITIA COORDINATION & NON-COERCIVE SAFETY NETWORKS

Article 11: Autonomous Defense Grid
ZSF’s militia structure shall operate under strict non-violent principles, with the following enhancements:

Real-time threat assessment via AI-driven surveillance of ecological and human-made hazards.

Decentralized response teams with no centralized command hierarchy.

Mandatory de-escalation protocols before any action is taken.

Article 12: Mutual Aid First Responder (MAFR) Units
Each district shall establish MAFR units composed of:

Medical responders

Emergency engineers

Community mediators

Units must undergo bi-monthly drills and remain on-call for disasters, supply-chain disruptions, or social unrest.

TITLE VI: POST-REPRESENTATIONAL PARTICIPATION SYSTEMS

Article 13: Dual-Anonymous Project Proposal System
To prevent consolidation of influence around high-visibility contributors, all project proposals shall be submitted under:

Anonymous digital signatures (cryptographically linked to civic identity for accountability)

Mandatory co-authorship between high- and low-contribution individuals

Article 14: Rotational Visibility Protocols
All communication channels (forums, broadcasts, project updates) shall enforce:

Strict time limits on high-visibility contributors.

Equal exposure rotations for all participants.

Automatic flagging of repeated over-exposure via algorithmic equity monitors.

TITLE VII: ZERO-WASTE & SUSTAINABILITY INFRASTRUCTURE

Article 15: Closed-Loop Resource Management
All districts shall implement:

Automated waste-to-resource conversion facilities.

Livestock and agricultural systems that eliminate byproducts.

24/7 public dashboards tracking resource flows.

Article 16: Ecological Impact Audits
Every project must undergo:

Pre-launch sustainability assessments.

Monthly resource-consumption reviews.

Immediate suspension if ecological breaches are detected.

TITLE VIII: LANGUAGE AND IDEOLOGICAL COMPLIANCE

Article 17: Anti-Stratification Lexicon Enforcement
All communication systems shall automatically flag and correct:

Meritocratic language ("high performers," "low contributors")

Hierarchical phrasing ("superior solution," "inferior proposal")

Reputational signaling ("trusted member," "verified citizen")

Article 18: Mandatory Ideological Training for PACMs
All council members must undergo quarterly training covering:

The dangers of stratification.

Non-coercive governance principles.

ASP compliance in communication.

Failure to demonstrate understanding shall result in temporary suspension from office.

Article 19: Disbarment & Permanent Ineligibility from Federated Civic Functions

To preserve the integrity of post-representational governance, the following conditions shall trigger permanent disbarment from any CAP-eligible, PACM-assigned, or federated council position:

1. Willful Subversion of the Anti-Stratification Principle (ASP):

Documented attempts to reinstate hierarchy, status systems, or coercive protocols

Use of influence to elevate self or allies through non-consensual or opaque methods

Participation in any scheme that introduces power centralization mechanisms

1. Cryptographic Tampering or Algorithmic Sabotage:

Unauthorized manipulation of provisioning, consensus, or visibility systems

Obstruction of livestream audits or falsification of civic ledger data

Insertion of black-box code or refusal to comply with code transparency mandates

1. Violent Coercion or Threats Against Civic Participants:

Verified incidents of physical or psychological coercion in service of policy enforcement

Evidence of intimidation, retaliation, or manipulation within proposal systems or MAFR networks

1. Resource Hoarding or Tier-0 Violation:

Redirection, withholding, or misappropriation of SAPs from Tier-0 provisions

Privileged access or unauthorized gating of unconditional survival infrastructure

Protocol Upon Violation:

Immediate revocation of civic access keys to all administrative systems

Public audit report published and permanently archived

Offending individual flagged in decentralized civic index as Disbarred Agent (DA-∞)

Optional restorative justice forums may be convened for community healing, but disbarment is irreversible unless overturned by global consensus of all active districts

Note: Disbarment does not remove access to Tier-0 survival systems. No punishment may interfere with basic provisioning. ZSF enforces justice without deprivation.

Conclusion

This Second Charter of Zero-State Federalism (ZSF) expands and refines the original constitutional framework, ensuring that ZSF remains a resilient, post-representational system capable of operating under crisis conditions. By further embedding algorithmic transparency, revocability, and anti-stratification principles, this doctrine strengthens ZSF’s ability to provide unconditional access to life-supporting infrastructure without coercion or hierarchy.

No states.
No classes.
No permanence.

Only encrypted coordination and mutual provisioning.

ZSF CHARTER 0
Zero-State Federalism: FOUNDATIONAL FRAMEWORK FOR A DECENTRALIZED CIVIC-INFRASTRUCTURAL PROTOCOL

TITLE I: PREAMBLE

In the full awareness of the ecological crisis, economic collapse, and ideological exhaustion of the prevailing global orders, this charter establishes the Zero-State Federalism (ZSF) Protocol as a non-sovereign, cryptographically-enforced social architecture designed to provision material life without coercion, hierarchy, or private ownership. ZSF is founded on the principles of voluntary cooperation, federated responsibility, non-monetary exchange, sustainable infrastructure, and post-representational accountability.

TITLE II: GENERAL PROVISIONS

Article 1: Definition of ZSF is a decentralized socio-technical framework for post-statist mutual aid. It replaces coercive governance with dynamic, participatory infrastructure governed through algorithmic transparency, cryptographic identity systems, and distributed social allocation.

Article 2: Non-Sovereign Status ZSF shall possess no sovereign authority, no monopoly on violence, and no coercive apparatus. All influence shall derive from voluntary interaction, cryptographic consensus, and mutual necessity.

Article 3: Rights of Persons

No person shall be illegal.

All persons, regardless of production status or origin, are entitled to food, shelter, water, health care, information, and infrastructural access.

All exemptions from productive responsibilities (disability, retirement, caretaking, etc.) are to be respected without prejudice.

TITLE III: CRYPTOGRAPHIC ALLOCATION SYSTEM (CAS)

Section A: Social Allocation Points (SAPs)

Article 4: Issuance of SAPs Every individual under ZSF shall receive 100 SAPs per 60-day allocation cycle. SAPs are programmable non-monetary micro-votes for project, service, and infrastructural provisioning.

Article 5: Allocation Structure

SAPs are divided into two major categories:

1. Essential Services Allocation
2. Leisure and Communal Project Allocation

SAP requirements are governed by performance tiering:

High Performers

Required to allocate 35–50 SAPs to essential services.

Must engage with 6–8 essential service categories.

Access to 50–65 SAPs for leisure/project allocation.

Low Performers

Required to allocate 50–70 SAPs to essential services.

Engage with 2–4 categories.

Access to 30–50 SAPs for leisure/project allocation.

Article 6: Performance Threshold Adjustment If an individual's production falls below the enforceable SAP threshold:

SAPs reduced to 60–70

Voting window reduced by 50%

Unspent or forfeited SAPs (30–40) automatically reallocated via algorithm to critical needs and underfunded projects.

A portion may be liquidated into cryptographic trade currency if surplus exists.

Article 7: Exemption Procedures

Individuals filing for exemptions enter "Social Limbo," during which their SAPs are preserved but participation is optional.

No penalties shall be applied until exemption is approved or denied.

Section B: Candidate Allocation Points (CAPs)

Article 8: Issuance of CAPs Every registered individual receives 20 CAPs per 60-day election cycle. CAPs are used to elect Project Allocation Council Members (PACMs), who are responsible for project menu curation and oversight.

Article 9: Voting Structure

Each person may vote for two candidates per cycle.

Voting distribution:

15/5 split (primary + secondary preference)

10/5/5 split (even distribution + random algorithmic assignment for last 5)

All CAPs must be used. No abstention permitted.
Participation in the voting system for PACMs is not strictly necessary. But highly encouraged.

Depending on size of district, 5 to 10 of unused points will be allocated to candidates with higher social consensus and alignment with social program reform. As far as expected projects are considered.

Article 10: District Structuring

Small Districts: 2 candidates available, 2 elected.

Medium Districts: 3–4 candidates, 2 elected.

Large Districts: Up to 5 candidates, 2 elected.

Candidates may only be re-elected after 4 full cycles (8 months). This is to avoid project over- consolidation.

Emergency extensions permitted only to complete pending project milestones.

Time under extension does not count toward the re-election wait period.

Non-essential projects can be frozen in light of re-election of the candidate who started that respective project after fulfilling their re-election wait period.

TITLE IV: SYSTEM ARCHITECTURE AND FUNCTIONAL DESIGN

Article 11: SAP System Interface The SAP user interface is structured as a dual-menu system:

1. Essential Services Menu (pre-assigned based on production metrics)
2. Project & Leisure Menu (custom-selectable user variables for allocation.)

Each project must transparently display:

Cryptographic budget summary

Resource estimates for two months of operations

Environmental/sustainability impact

Intercommunal trade coefficients

Article 12: Overflow Redistribution Protocol

Surplus funding from over-allocated projects is automatically redirected to:

Social Service Reserve Funds

Climate Infrastructure

Emergency Capacities

Low-visibility essential co-ops

Article 13: Real-Time Allocation Access

SAP system is operational 24/7, from day 1 to day 26 of each cycle.

Voting interface displays live changes in project funding and algorithmic redistribution.

TITLE V: REPRESENTATION AND COUNCIL FUNCTIONS

Article 14: Project Allocation Council Members (PACMs) PACMs function as civic facilitators, not rulers. Their duties include:

Publishing project menus

Interfacing with co-op laborers

Coordinating project updates and timelines

Mediating between citizen SAP allocations and algorithmic triage

Article 15: PACM Oversight and Continuity

PACMs must step down for no less than 4 full cycles, unless a project is pending.

Emergency project extension must be narrow-scoped.

New PACMs elected simultaneously during the extension period.

Original candidate influence limited to project extension agreement formulated in part by Local Federated Council as to not limit the influence and flow of the project plans of the new candidate.

TITLE VI: ECONOMIC SUBSYSTEM AND CRYPTO-CURRENCY GOVERNANCE

Article 16: Non-Human Currency Handling

Trade currency is algorithmically managed, non-sentient, and autonomous.

Used only for intercommunal/international trade.

Oversight limited to maintenance livestreamed publicly.

Unauthorized or off-record maintenance is strictly prohibited. and punishable by all allocation points being reallocated only to social funds. Thus ensuring the individual is still not left behind, but excluded from authorized function for an extended period which must be voted for by three individual collectives via Federated Council/Local emergency votes. This could be considered a form of social probation to punish individuals that would choose to attempt to manipulate Federated ZSF trust services for their own benefit.

Repeated or severe attempts at tampering with Federated ZSF trust services may result in leisure SAP's being permanently seized and liquidated into decentralized trade currencies. were allocated to underfunded social services and or low visibility projects.

Article 17: Algorithmic Needs and Request Boxes

Users may submit material needs through non-SAP-bound request channels.

Requests are logged, categorized, and queued by the economic algorithm.

Only necessity-classified items are guaranteed fulfillment.

TITLE VII: FINAL CLAUSES

Article 18: Principle of Reciprocated Liberty; All rights within ZSF are tied not to production, but to mutual responsibility. Participation is voluntary; survival is not conditional.

Article 19: Adaptive Federation ZSF communes may federate horizontally across bioregions, data networks, and kinship structures. All federations must respect:

Transparency

Revocability

Public consensus priority for decision-making

Article 20: Systemic Collapse Clause In the event of collapse or disruption of algorithmic systems, SAPs and CAPs revert to manual consensus at the commune level via emergency quorum.

Ratified on this day by all participants under the shared vision of post-state humanity.

No states.
No classes.
No permanence.

Only encrypted coordination and mutual provisioning.

This transmission marks the initiation of the Zero State Federalism in the public sphere. We extend this signal to anarchist communist libertarian socialist and all anti authoritarian leftist formations who recognize the exhaustion of extant models and the urgent need for a deployable framework for post capitalist life.

ZSF is presented as a foundational framework for a decentralized civic infrastructural protocol. It is also a movement and a banner of solidarity. Its purpose is to provide a concrete architectural plan for a society organized without coercion hierarchy or private ownership. We seek not to replace existing ideologies but to offer a functional skeleton upon which their shared goals can be realized at scale.

CORNERSTONES SHARED WITH PARENT TRADITIONS

FROM ANARCHISM ZSF adopts the core principle of non sovereignty. It explicitly abolishes the monopoly on violence and all forms of coercive governance. It champions voluntary association and federated cooperation as the basis for social organization. The system is designed to prefigure the world it aims to create building decentralized structures now that reflect a stateless future.

FROM COMMUNISM ZSF embodies the principle from each according to ability to each according to need. This is operationalized through the Social Allocation Point system which guarantees unconditional access to life necessities food shelter water healthcare while dynamically coordinating contributions. The protocol seeks to abolish class not through a centralized party but through a cryptographically enforced provisioning system that eliminates the capital relation.

FROM COMMUNALISM AND COUNCIL COMMUNISM ZSF integrates the concept of post representational accountability. The Project Allocation Council Members are facilitators not rulers. Their authority is strictly limited rotating and subject to immediate revocation. Decision making is pushed to the base level through continuous cryptographic voting and allocation.

FROM MUTUALISM AND SOLIDARITY ECONOMICS ZSF implements a non monetary network of exchange. Social Allocation Points are programmable micro votes for resource allocation not a currency. They facilitate a direct democracy of economic planning where individuals allocate productive capacity to projects and services they deem valuable.

A FRAMEWORK FOR FEDERATION

ZSF is designed for application and scaling. It is not a utopian blueprint for a distant future but a protocol that can be integrated into existing movements and communities. Whether an urban housing cooperative a rural agricultural commune or a digital network of mutual aid ZSF provides a standardized yet adaptable system for coordination.

The charter details mechanisms for cryptographic allocation tiered provisioning restorative justice and decentralized defense. These are modular components. A community can adopt the SAP system for internal economic planning while another might federate using the CAP system for regional project coordination. The goal is interoperability between diverse anti authoritarian struggles creating a shared language and operational toolkit.

A BANNER OF SOLIDARITY

We recognize the historical and ongoing divisions within the far left. ZSF does not seek to erase the distinct contributions of various traditions but to find a functional synthesis on which we can converge. Our strength is fragmented in isolated ideological pockets. ZSF offers a platform for unified action under a shared constitutional framework.

This is a call to engage to critique to build and to federate. We are beginning the process of assembling the initial federated councils and testing the algorithmic allocation systems in simulated environments. We invite anarchists communists and all post capitalist leftists to examine the charter to discuss its mechanisms and to consider how its protocols could be applied within your own contexts.

Let this be the start of a coordinated construction. Let us build the infrastructure of the next world within the shell of the old using encrypted coordination and mutual provisioning.